Jump to content

Talk:Austrian Airlines

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move

[edit]

Airline's brand name is Austrian.--theltalpha 12:29, 1 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

  • I agree with the other oppose commenters. The point is not to have the "correct" name, but to have a name that's as correct as possible, and that will help people find what they're looking for. Most people know me by the name "Ted" but that doesn't mean I can have the disambiguation page Ted for a page about me. And that airline owned by United? It's page here is Ted (airline). Tedernst 14:24, 1 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I understand the arguments. So if I summarize correctly the steps to be taken are:

Correct?--theltalpha 13:54, 2 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, and support all of that, if we're voting. ナイトスタリオン ✉ 14:08, 2 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I'd also support a move to Austrian (airline), if nominator or an administrator were to close this current vote and start a new vote for a move to Austrian (airline). Marco79 17:43, 3 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This title is incorrect

[edit]

They didn't change the official name of the airline. They just took the word "Airlines" off the livery. This is no different than every major airline in the US (American, Delta, United.) They might refer to themselves by an abbreviated name, but the word "Airlines" is still a part of the name. So this article needs to be under Austrian Airlines. - Sekicho 00:05, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with you, Sekicho, 100% on that. And besides, everybody calls it Austrian Airlines, not Austrian. CrnaGora (Talk | Contribs | E-mail) 16:26, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Then propose a move. DON'T CUT AND PASTE THE PAGE. EVER. That wrecks the page history. FearÉIREANN\(caint) 21:49, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It dominates the market for flights to Central and Eastern Europe, NONSENSE!!

[edit]

The statement in the first paragraph about Austrian Airlines dominating the market for flights to Central and Eastern Europe is marked citation needed but it clearly needs to be removed. Germany is often considered Central Europe and Lufthansa clearly dominates flights to the region if Germany is included..also Russia is clearly Eastern Europe and Aeroflot operates more flights to "Eastern Europe" from outside the region than Austrian, since most of its flights land in Vienna and not what is generally called Eastern Europe. Even if the person who made the statement was only referring to the region between Germany and Russia the statement is nonsense since most of the region's countries have their own flag carriers that dominate flight in their respective countries, Malev in Hungary, LOT in Poland, etc. I removed the statement.--84.153.52.70 21:27, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

bad news?

[edit]

Chicken or the egg came first? I read that OS wanted to end money losing Asian routes so it got rid of A340 and A330's but kept Lauda Air 767 and 777's. Archtransit 16:18, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Any Objections?

[edit]

Anybody object to my adding a section on OS's travel classes? According to WP:Airlines that is an acceptable section to add. Thoughts? Neo16287 (talk) 12:48, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fleet Size?

[edit]

In the upper corner fleet size is 41 (2 on order/lease). In the detailed list below it is only 36. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.108.29.252 (talk) 10:16, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Does Austrian Airlines still have plans for ordering extra 4 Boeing 777's for 2013 and 2014? Email me for any answers. Thanks. (talk) 23:13, 13 November 2012(UTC)

Is it still a Flag Carrier?

[edit]

Now that Austrian Airlines is 100% owned by Lufthansa, can it still be referred to as a "flag carrier" of Austria? You've got other airlines such as Niki growing bigger all the time. Austrian Airlines is now vastly reduced compared to its former days, and a shadow of its former self. Why is the German-owned Austrian Airlines still a "national flag carrier"?--Lester 01:16, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:OELNJ.VIE.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:OELNJ.VIE.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Other speedy deletions
What should I do?
Speedy deletions at commons tend to take longer than they do on Wikipedia, so there is no rush to respond. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 14:14, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

accidents / inaccuracy?

[edit]

the bombs causing near-crash of Austrian Air and crash of Swissair plane in 1970 were transported on these very planes because of changes in flight schedules, not on purpose, they should have wrecked El-Al ones, according to reknown Swiss daily "Neue Zürcher Zeitung" (four articles, from 27. 12. 2014 to 31. 12. 2014) as well as other sources in German (aviation magazin "www.austrianwings.info" e. g.) And it seems, there was a thorough investigation in Germany and Switzerland, as to who sent the parcels with the bomb, but governments of both States blocked any legal action, probably fearing further attacks, the Swiss attorney handling the incident then, Robert Akeret, says in an interview. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.144.230.33 (talk) 00:22, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Austrian Airlines. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:26, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Abusalaislamkhan2

[edit]

What is my work Faysal120 (talk) 14:41, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Austrian Airlines. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:26, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Two things

[edit]

I have two things that I wanted to bring up:

1. In 2018, Austrian underwent a brand refresh, which included some changes to their website and app, a new livery, and logo update. I believe the new logo was once already posted here but that edit was later reverted. I think that the logo posted at the top of the page should be changed to their latest one since the article should stay up-to-date.

I cannot access Wikimedia Commons on my laptop, so I can't post that logo there, and I don't exactly understand how the whole copyright thing works and how to change images.

My question is: would someone else be up to do this? A good quality image of Austrian's new logo can be found on this website if you scroll down a bit:

https://heyworld.com/en/home/

It appears small, so open it in a new tab.

2. The image of an Austrian Boeing 767-300ER in the "Fleet" section has been changed to show one in a new livery. Other than that 767, Austrian already has painted one of their Airbus A321-200s in the new livery, so I think the A321's image should also be updated.

This website provides some photos, and I think the first one is pretty good since it shows the entire plane.

http://www.airportspotting.com/austrian-airlines-livery-pictures/

Also, a Boeing 777-200ER has been painted a "60 Years" special livery, which is also the new livery with some extra details, so the 777-200ER's image could be updated too.

Here's a pretty decent image I found on Flickr:

https://www.flickr.com/photos/erichwillmann/32926986967/

EnjoyingMyProblems (talk) 10:10, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:Austrian_Airlines&oldid=1263394863"