Jump to content

Talk:Australian industrial relations legislation national day of protest, 2005

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Protest estimates

[edit]

The figures reported here for what organisers estimated appear incorrect. According to a media release by Sharan Burrows (ACTU President) the figures here seem inderstated. Community Protest Against New IR Laws Bigger Than Expected Estimating crowd sizes in the tens of thousands is mostly guess work, so attribution is useful to determine who's estimate you are reading. I have no problem in using two estimates for each crowd, correctly attributed, so that readers can make up their own minds on crowd size. --Takver 02:36, 16 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I have updated the figures to concurr with the estimate in Ms Burrow's media release--Takver 03:21, 16 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Can Tirin name a major national protest movement in which Melbourne has not had a bigger crowd than Sydney? (Gay Mardi Gras doesn't count). Adam 03:53, 16 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds like a challenge. While protest events are generally better attended in Melbourne on national/global issues or days of protest, and taking into account conservative crowd estimates, I can think of at least 3 events in which Sydney crowds were bigger than Melbourne:

1985: Palm Sunday Peace March Sydney: estimated 170,000 people Source: Margot Kingston SMH column[1]: "In 1985, more than 300,000 people marched across Australia in Palm Sunday anti-nuclear rallies. The biggest rally was in Sydney, where 170,000 people brought the city to a standstill. (SMH, 1-4-1985, p.1)" I was a participant in the Sydney event. It was huge.

2000: Walk for Reconciliation Sydney: On Sunday 28 May up to 400,000, but generally estimated in most reports as 250,000 Australians, walked across the Sydney Harbour Bridge in support of reconciliation. (Source: Gadigal website, Workers Online, Stolen Generation) Melbourne: On Sunday 3 December. 150,000 (police estimate) to 400,000 (Organisers) The VTHC said 350,000. Read and viewed accounts of Sydney walk while holidaying in NSW. Participated in Melbourne walk. On balance I would say a greater number attended the Sydney event.

2003: February 14/16 Peace Rally Sydney: Estimated at 250,000 (police) and between 300,000 to 500,000 (organisers) Melbourne: Estimated at 150,000 (police) to 200,000 (Organisers) February_15,_2003_global_anti-war_protest uses 250,000 for Sydney and 150,000 for Melbourne Participated in Melbourne rally.

There are probably more examples further back in history, but these were the ones I have some personal experience with through personal participation and reading news accounts/histories of from 1970 onwards.--Takver 12:49, 16 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

OK I am happy to concede those, although I wouldn't take Margo Kingston's word on anything, and figures of 350,000 and 400,000 are totally fanciful. It is a sad fact that "organisers" of these events always wildly exaggerate (probably not deliberately) the size of crowds, as I once demonstrated. Adam 23:33, 16 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Australian industrial relations legislation national day of protest, 2005. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:26, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]