Talk:Australian Scout Jamboree

Scouting High‑importance

	Scouting portal Australian Scout Jamboree is part of the Scouting WikiProject, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Scouting and Guiding on the Wikipedia. This includes but is not limited to boy and girl organizations, WAGGGS and WOSM organizations as well as those not so affiliated, country and region-specific topics, and anything else related to Scouting. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ScoutingWikipedia:WikiProject ScoutingTemplate:WikiProject ScoutingScouting articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article was the project's Portal article of the month (October 2010).

Australia Low‑importance

	Australia portal Australian Scout Jamboree is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Link to Asia Pacific Jamboree

Some Australian jamborees are also Asia-Pacific Jamborees. Should these pages be linked?

--RobBrisbane 01:55, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merge of 21st Australian Jamboree to Australian Scout Jamboree

This merge has been proposed for some time, but no discussion has taken place. An anon editor removed the merge tags today, with no explanation. I have reverted that as it seems to me that we need to debate it. --Bduke 22:46, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You should have just moved the AJ2007 material as it makes sense to do so. There is a good argument for having separate articles on each AJ as they are quite significant events as regards their contribution to local economies etc Albatross2147 02:36, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Maybe I should have. Each AJ may well be notable, but there is not a single source for any of the Jamborees other than the 2007 one in the article. Notability is confirmed if people outside Scouting recognise the event. --Bduke 02:42, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Support merge

The recent Jamboree is the only one that has it own article. Just because it is recent does not make it more notable than the others. All individual jamborees are not notable enough for an article and should be merged to the general article on Oz Jamborees. Indeed some people might argue that the general article should be merged to Scouts Australia. --Bduke 22:46, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
support merge-unless or until the article itself becomes larger than a paragraph and worthy of a full-fledged article, let it germinate in the ASJ article. Chris 05:12, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
support merge - it does not have enough to justify a separate article at the moment. RobBrisbane 10:14, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support per bduke. The references on the 2007 articles show notability but no jamboree is any more notable than any other (except maybe 1987?? World Jamboree in Sydney) and so references from AJ2007 could be used in the more general article. :: maelgwn talk 12:03, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose merge

I oppose the merge. I was there and I know many people there would like it kept up as a memory of AJ. It wont hurt any one to have it up, so why take it down???Scoutfromaus 09:00, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

** Oppose. All the usual deletionista suspects here I see. Silliest arguments are those relating to brevity. Obviously on that criteria all bios ( < 10000 words?) should be moved to omnibus articles called People who are dead and People who are not dead yet Albatross2147 02:27, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. While I am sure there is consensus to move the material, I would like to see some discussion about how much of the material from the recent Jamboree is merged and how the layout of the Australian Scout Jamboree be altered. Alternatively someone else other than me could just be bold and do the merge. --Bduke 10:56, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've been bold myself and done it. Feel free to modify what I did. --Bduke 23:16, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Activities repeated

The activities at the 2007 jamboree are now stated twice on the page. D3av 04:06, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Scouts Australia.svg

The image Image:Scouts Australia.svg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --04:52, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Japan boys scout vist australia 2nd jamboree

I just wondering did the boy scout from Japan did vist Sydney Australia for the 2nd Australia Scout Jamboree. Can you write the answer please? From Aiden2009 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Aiden2009 (talk • contribs) 10:14, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Australian Scout Jamboree. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:56, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]