Talk:Australian Monarchist League

	Australia portal Australian Monarchist League is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian politics (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Organizations Start‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

There is heaps of self advertisment on this article. For example, why should there be any contact information. Another thing I would like to ask is why is there some thing about the cost of membership on it?--61.69.235.31 10:18, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Which Act of Settlement?

Which Act of Settlement is intended here? That establishing sucession to the throne (1701?). Link is to a disambiguation page. 66.19.65.132 22:39, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Court case

The article says:

"Nevertheless, the Australian Monarchist League played a role in the proceedings, including unsuccessfully taking the Australian Electoral Commission to the Federal Court in order to gain a firmer definition of what would count as a "yes" vote in the referendum, arguing that the planned approach (accepting any vote in which the voter's intention was clear) was such that the counting would be weighted towards "yes" and "opened the door for electoral fraud".[6][7][8][9]"

I think you will find AML spokesperson Phillip Benwell brought this action in his own name and not that of the league. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.164.34.60 (talk) 12:14, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have added a relevant tag to that section of the article. HiLo48 (talk) 05:40, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]