Talk:Australasian Journal of Educational Technology

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Academic Journals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Academic Journals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Academic JournalsWikipedia:WikiProject Academic JournalsTemplate:WikiProject Academic JournalsAcademic Journal
See WikiProject Academic Journals' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Australia Low‑importance

	Australia portal Australasian Journal of Educational Technology is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Resource Exchange

If you have access to this resource, or if you need to verify a citation from this reference, check out WikiProject Resource Exchange.Resource ExchangeWikipedia:WikiProject Resource ExchangeTemplate:WikiProject Resource ExchangeResource Exchange

Merge from IJET

This editorial in AJET states that the board of AJET approved in 2007 a merger from the International Journal of Educational Technology, and the about AJET page now states "In 2007 we announced the merger of IJET (International Journal of Educational Technology) with AJET, marked by the creation of the new IJET Archives." I suggest a merger of the corresponding Wikipedia articles; they're both kind of weak as articles on their own and would be strengthened by being combined, as it would give more of a story to tell about their history, I think. —David Eppstein 06:07, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. In general earlier titles that lasted for only a short period should be merged into a combined article under the present title. Libraries in the US list each title separately to avoid confusing the details, but even for this specialized use separate listing has always been controversial (& personally as a librarian I have never liked it). For a general encyclopedia, it seems unnecessary & will produce too many small articles difficult to support. I'd say that in general the preferred handling in almost all cases would be to merge, unless the various parts had significant independent existences. DGG (talk) 22:18, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Seeing no objection, I performed the merge. —David Eppstein 02:22, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on Australasian Journal of Educational Technology. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:32, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]