Talk:Augusta Leigh

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography

Women's History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

"A child of an incestuous relationship was superstitiously thought likely to be deformed"

Actually, a child born from a endogamic relationship really has a great chance of suffer from genetic anomalyes, "deformities" indeed.

(It can sounds weird, cause I'm not a English language native speaker.

"Incest in those days was a very serious and scandalous offence;"

It still is! 124.187.103.188 10:07, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Medora

The majority of this article seems to be about Medora Leigh rather than the subject. Would it make sense to merge much of the Medora section into the Elizabeth Medora Leigh article? - Scribble Monkey (talk) 15:09, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Extremely confusing

I totally agree with the previous commentator, about "Medora". Only, it is much worse: not only does Medora - who already has her own article (so a link would have been more than enough) - occupy most of the article, but after the paragraph discussing Medora there is no further discussion about Augusta herself. We don't even get to learn when, where or how she died (I mean, from the body of the text). There is no discussion whatsoever about the later life of her, who is the subject of the article. This absolutely should be amended ASAP. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.142.40.110 (talk) 16:05, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

So do I totally agree. What's more it means that a lot of information about Medora herself is not on hr page. PhilomenaO'M (talk) 14:56, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]