Talk:August 2016 Gaziantep bombing

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the August 2016 Gaziantep bombing article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

A news item involving August 2016 Gaziantep bombing was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 22 August 2016.

Wikipedia

While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard.

Crime and Criminal Biography: Terrorism Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Terrorism task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Disaster management Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Islam: Islam and Controversy Low‑importance

	Islam portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Islam and Controversy task force.

Turkey Low‑importance

	Turkey portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Turkey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Turkey and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TurkeyWikipedia:WikiProject TurkeyTemplate:WikiProject TurkeyTurkey articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.

Wikipedians in Turkey may be able to help!

The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Part of Terrorism in Turkey?

Should Terrorism in Turkey be added in "part of"? Although perpetrators haven't been confirmed, all suspected perpetrators are sanctioned as terrorist groups and the attack bears hallmarks of a terrorist attack. DinoBambinoNFS (talk) 14:50, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, once someone has created that article. Jim Michael (talk) 17:22, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I didn't realise it didn't even exist. DinoBambinoNFS (talk) 10:38, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Perpetrators

As far as I know, nobody suspects from Kurdistan Workers' Party. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gerhidt (talk • contribs) 21:04, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yousaf465 has evidence connecting the attack to Indian intelligence agencies. El cid, el campeador (talk) 22:08, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Then how come the Dawn source says "Mehmet Erdogan, a ruling Justice and Development Party (AKP) lawmaker for Gaziantep said it was not clear who was responsible for the explosion but there was a “high possibility” it was a suicide attack that could have been launched by IS or the Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK)." DinoBambinoNFS (talk) 11:14, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Why would a Kurdish group bomb a Kurdish wedding? Jim Michael (talk) 11:32, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jim this article or this website isn't for figuring out how such and such thing can happen. We create articles upon information given by sources, not upon what we think is possible or not. DinoBambinoNFS (talk) 11:56, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DinoBambinoNFS "Strongly Agree" we have to rely on WP:Reliable sources for creating articles.--yousaf465' 15:29, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Remote controlled bomb is not a suicide bomb

If the bomb was activated by remote control, then it's not accurate to call it a suicide bomb, even though that's what sources are calling it. 71.182.247.106 (talk) 01:22, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

All sources say it was a suicide bomber who targeted the wedding. DinoBambinoNFS (talk) 10:45, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Any source which mention it being activated by remote control ? I couldn't find any. --yousaf465' 15:30, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. "ISIS child suicide bomber blown up by remote control kills dozens in Turkey" http://www.iraqinews.com/arab-world-news/suicide-bombing-hits-wedding-ceremony-turkey-dozens-killed/ 71.182.250.107 (talk) 01:22, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You should read the whole article carefully, not just the headline. Except in the headline, there is no mention of remote control in the source. It also clearly mentions that Deputy Prime Minister and President said it was a suicide bomb:

Turkish deputy Prime Minister Mehmet Simsek stated that the explosion seems to have been triggered by a suicide bomber.

Meanwhile, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan said, “A suicide bombing which killed 51 people in the Turkish city of Gaziantep was carried out by a 12 to 14-year-old child.

In the main body of the article, no remote controlled bomb is mentioned. It is clear the source you have cited has committed a mistake in its headline. Regardless, all of other sources say it was a suicide bomb.DinoBambinoNFS (talk) 20:20, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop changing details until the situation becomes clear

I see a lot of users keep changing the content including perpetrators, death toll and number of injuries as they see fit. Details are usually not clear after such attacks. A number of sources differ on the details. Therefore we should wait for some time until the situation becomes clear. DinoBambinoNFS (talk) 11:05, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

PKK speculation:

WP:BLP does apply here, as PKK consists of living persons. Just because a specific person is not named, it does not mean BLP does not apply. Also it's WP:RECENTISM to include it. In a year or 10, the very early accusations by Turkish parliamentarians will not be relevant at all. The story is unfolding that it was Islamic State, and we should focus on that. --Harizotoh9 (talk) 16:31, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WP:BLP doesn't apply here. --yousaf465' 16:45, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

PKK is an organisation, BLP only applies to persons not organisations. Claiming that BLP applies because PKK consists of living persons is real speculation and self-interpertation, because nowhere does BLP states it applies to any organizations as well.

Also Dawn says "Mehmet Erdogan, a ruling Justice and Development Party (AKP) lawmaker for Gaziantep said it was not clear who was responsible for the explosion but there was a “high possibility” it was a suicide attack that could have been launched by IS or the Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK)." So what speculation are you talking about? They are only called "suspects", so I fail to see any rational reason behind your move.

In addition RECENTISM is your changing of death toll from 50+ to 54. Please note that different sources give different tolls sometimes. We cannot prefer any one source over another.

Last of all, please note that we are not here to edit based on what you or anyone thinks. We add information based on what the sources say. DinoBambinoNFS (talk) 16:46, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Turkey's response

Turkey's response need to mentioned. They have bombed both IS and PKK position in Syria. Turkey shells both IS and Kurdish positions in Syria--yousaf465' 19:02, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]