Talk:Aubinadong River

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.

Wikipedians in Ontario may be able to help!

The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

A fact from Aubinadong River appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 8 September 2023, and was viewed approximately 4,448 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the Aubinadong River in Ontario, Canada, was an indigenous canoe route and is still used for canoe camping as its main recreational activity?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2023/September. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Aubinadong River.

Wikipedia

Canada: Ontario / Geography Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Ontario portal This article is supported by WikiProject Ontario.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Geography of Canada.

Rivers Low‑importance

	Geography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rivers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rivers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RiversWikipedia:WikiProject RiversTemplate:WikiProject RiversRiver articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cielquiparle (talk) 06:29, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that the Aubinadong River (in Ontario, Canada) was an indigenous canoe route and is still being used for canoe camping as the main recreational activity? Source: Ref #1 (Aubinabong River Provincial Park Management Statement, section 3.4)
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Angeline Quinto discography

Created by P199 (talk). Self-nominated at 17:25, 15 August 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Aubinadong River; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

New enough, long enough and within policy as far as I can determine. (Is "indigenous" the accepted wording? I'm unfamiliar with the nomenclature here.) The hook is interesting and supported by what is written in the article and sourced from reliable sources; however each sentence supporting the hook facts needs to be supported by an inline citation. No image, QPQ done. Fix the very minor issue with the citation and this should be good to go. Yakikaki (talk) 14:31, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks @Yakikaki: for your review. As for citations, let's use some common sense. The info is in a short paragraph of 3 short sentences, with the reference at the end - which is more than obvious that the entire paragraph is based on the same source. Adding inline citations for each sentence only makes sense if different sources were used. Regards, -- P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:20, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reply @P199:. It's not me that you have to convince, I agree with you that common sense dictates that this should be let through as it is. However, eligibility criterion 3b (at WP:DYK) states that "Each fact in the hook must be supported in the article by at least one inline citation to a reliable source, appearing no later than the end of the sentence(s) offering that fact. Citations at the end of the paragraph are not sufficient. This rule applies even when a citation would not be required for the purposes of the article." Unfortunately, I have been involved in cases before where I let common sense prevail over this rule and the result was that the hook was pulled from the queue and a lot of husstle ensued. So to spare yourself that, I would advice you to add those citations. It's not going to get queued before you do, I'm afraid. Kind regards, Yakikaki (talk) 08:18, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Yakikaki: Noted and done. Thanks again. -- P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:54, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent it's good to go. Yakikaki (talk) 20:25, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]