Talk:Attribute (computing)

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

What's the difference between an attribute and a property in computing?

The term attribute can and is often treated as equivalent to a property depending on the technology being discussed.

However, attributes might more correctly be considered metadata. An attribute is frequently a property of a property.

A good example is the process of XML assigning values to properties (elements). Note the element's value is typically found before the (separate) end tag, not in the element. However, note the element itself may have a number of attributes set (NAME="IAMAPROPERTY"). If the element in question could be considered a property (CUSTOMER_NAME) of another entity (lets say CUSTOMER), the element can have zero or more attributes (properties) of its own.

This would lead to the assertion that customers have properties, but a text button control has attributes. I would further assert that an attribute contains a value and while it can be, is not necessarily, an option. DHorse1 (talk) 23:28, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Change title?

Should we not change the title into Attribute (computer science), conforming to similar articles? -DePiep 11:24, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious C# usage claim?

For C#, the article contains a confusing or misleading claim: "With attributes, it is possible to extend attributes such as abstract, sealed, or public.<ref name="Attributes">"

You can't extend those built-in attributes. What the author of the linked presentation meant was that it's possible to add additional attributes, thus extending the set of usable attributes (like the in-built abstract, sealed, or public).

I'm deleting that whole sentence, feel free to rephrase and put it back in if you believe it has value. Relatively random (talk) 14:38, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An attribute of concepts is___

Answer 110.224.6.136 (talk) 09:38, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]