Talk:Atticus (band)

Tennessee Low‑importance

	Tennessee portal Atticus (band) is within the scope of WikiProject Tennessee, an open collaborative effort to coordinate work for and sustain comprehensive coverage of Tennessee and related subjects in the Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, and even become a member. [Project Articles] • [Project Page] • [Project Talk] • [Assessment] • [Template Usage]TennesseeWikipedia:WikiProject TennesseeTemplate:WikiProject TennesseeTennessee articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Notability Tags

In the spirit of intellectual honesty, discussion regarding the tags should be here. DreamGuy mentioned adding references and seemed to think a list of notable airplay was an indication of non-notability. I haven't seen airplay lists mentioned anywhere in the Wikipedia literature as being non-notable. If you can find it, please link. Anyway, the airplay list may not have been exhaustive. It appears to be pulled directly from the Band's website.

Regarding notability, there isn't a doubt the band warrants an entry. National airplay, IMDb credits, publishing in secondary sources such as newspapers and magazines. I'll get to work on finishing the references but it may take a couple weeks. Thank you for your patience. Winick88 (talk) 18:07, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've been really busy lately and haven't had much time to edit. I honestly don't care to sink much more into this effort given the page already meets the burden set forth by Wikipedia notability guidelines. I welcome any additions fellow editors may have, but at this point the nationwide WB network exposure, IMDb credits, magazine, book, and newspaper citations should be sufficient to remove the tags. I'll give it a few more weeks before removing the tags in order to give everyone the opportunity to voice dissenting opinions here. Thanks. Winick88 (talk) 23:47, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I had considered AfD awhile back. But the Daily Beacon article plus the Daily Buzz just barely does it as far as notability, imho. Dlabtot (talk) 23:58, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm removing the tags. Please discuss rationale here before re-adding them. Thanks. Winick88 (talk) 01:43, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Spam Comments

Does anyone know more about their first bassist? I know his name was Jamal but I have no idea what his last name is or how I can find out. 71.16.224.178

i thought atticus broke up and aron and donnie were starting a new band

Atticus isn't emo. Atticus is way too good to be emo.

i agree rolling stone said they were just plain rock 172.132.57.116

When are they gonna start touring again? I've been wanting to go to an Atticus show for years but they don't come to Connecticut a lot. Or maybe they do and I just don't hear about it. Either way, I want an Atticus concert! Who's with me?

i hope they aren't breaking up for good because that would suck. there my favorite band ever!!!

ATTICUS SUX!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

atticus is better now without the morons in the band. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.155.116.202 (talk) 02:08, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Romance Is A Slowdance (1m 44s).ogg

Image:Romance Is A Slowdance (1m 44s).ogg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 08:46, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Sir Loinsteak 94-1--1-.3 Interview (2m 33s).ogg

Image:Sir Loinsteak 94-1--1-.3 Interview (2m 33s).ogg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 05:34, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Gtacover.jpg

Image:Gtacover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 22:12, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Atticus (band). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:26, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Atticus (band). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.moderndrunkardmagazine.com/issues/11-02/11_02_top_songs.htm
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111222201533/http://www.moderndrunkardmagazine.com/issues/11-02/11_02_top_songs.htm to http://www.moderndrunkardmagazine.com/issues/11-02/11_02_top_songs.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:46, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]