Talk:Athletics at the 2008 Summer Paralympics – Men's 400 metres T44
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
World Record
[edit]I'm not familiar with athletics articles, I came here via Pistorius because he's been in the news, but I was wondering if it's right to have the 'WR' next to Jim Bob Bizzell's time. I assume it means he beat the world record that stood before the race, but since Pistorius beat that three seconds or so before Bizzell, does it really count? To me it would make more sense to have an asterix and at the bottom state 'this time also beat the previous record', because had I known nothing about athletics I wouldn't have necessarily known that 'WR' stood for world record, since it appears twice.BulbaThor (talk) 09:36, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Athletics at the 2008 Summer Paralympics – Men's 400 metres T44. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081010131137/http://results.beijing2008.cn/WRMP/ENG/INF/AT/C73A/ATM440101.pdf to http://results.beijing2008.cn/WRMP/ENG/INF/AT/C73A/ATM440101.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:22, 11 July 2017 (UTC)