Talk:Atchison Village, Richmond, California

California: San Francisco Bay Area Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	San Francisco Bay Area portal This article is supported by San Francisco Bay Area task force (assessed as Low-importance).

National Register of Historic Places Low‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

image

can someone get a pic of the village?Cholga 20:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

cleanup

the references need to be worked into the articleCholga 20:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Revision

I made some big changes to this page today, and I'm aware there is still much work to be done. I eliminated some things that I thought were unnecessary, and moved some sections around to bring them more into an organized format. Please leave any feedback you may have about my edits. Thank you. Paradoxsociety 07:13, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I tried to do something too mainly by rearranging the description section and introducing the inhabitants section. Still, the whole thing reads like an ad zu move to AV. I think it should be more neutral.--Kojozone (talk) 08:35, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Could do with a rework ... lots of "Currently" (when!?) ... and 2012 prices. Alanf777 (talk) 01:19, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]