Talk:Atari Coldfire Project

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Computer hardware task force (assessed as Low-importance).

It is requested that an image or photograph of Atari Coldfire Project be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

quite lengthy

This article describes quite lengthy the history of former Atari (and Clone) computers and only a short paragraph about the ACP itself - missing topics are what the ACP exactly is, what the advantages and disadvantages are, why the name »Coldfire« and so on.

Ghoffart (talk) 08:12, 1 July 2008 (UTC)--[reply]

The name Coldfire is because of the processor. This is implied in the article. "the ACP will use a completely new design, moving away from 68K CPUs to the newer ColdFire class, more powerful than even the fastest 68K chips while still having a largely similar (but not completely compatible) instruction set." This is a page on the processor: http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Coldfire Centerone (talk) 22:37, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Needs an Update

Details are outdated, can someone update this article.

Updated some details, more is needed So-retro-it-hurts (talk) 01:21, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Trouble archiving links on the article

Hello. I am finding myself repeatedly archiving links on this page. This usually happens when the archive doesn't recognize the archive to be good.

This could be because the link is either a redirect, or I am unknowingly archiving a dead link. Please check the following links to see if it's redirecting, or in anyway bad, and fix them, if possible.

http://ahcc.atari.org/

In any event this will be the only notification in regards to these links, and I will discontinue my attempts to archive these pages.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 12:31, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Atari Coldfire Project. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120306223943/http://www.atarimusic.net/index.php/component/content/article/37-fp-rokstories/66-atari-firebee-an-atari-coldfire-clone-built-for-music to http://www.atarimusic.net/index.php/component/content/article/37-fp-rokstories/66-atari-firebee-an-atari-coldfire-clone-built-for-music

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:04, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]