Talk:Atalopedes campestris

Insects Low‑importance

	Insects portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Insects, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of insects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InsectsWikipedia:WikiProject InsectsTemplate:WikiProject InsectsInsects articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lepidoptera Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lepidoptera, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of butterflies and moths on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LepidopteraWikipedia:WikiProject LepidopteraTemplate:WikiProject LepidopteraLepidoptera articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Atalopedes campestris. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110527001908/http://nhic.mnr.gov.on.ca/MNR/nhic/elements/el_report.cfm?elid=180887 to http://nhic.mnr.gov.on.ca/MNR/nhic/elements/el_report.cfm?elid=180887

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:40, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Changing the quality rating of the article

Edited the quality of article in line with the ORES tool which predicted quality: B (3.8).- Ambrosia10 (talk) 21:35, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Atalopedes huron

https://doi.org/10.5281%2Fzenodo.7160429 proposes that Atalopedes huron be resurrected as a distinct species. (It's currently treated as a subspecies of Atalopedes campestris on English Wikipedia.) Nosferattus (talk) 04:45, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]