This article is within the scope of WikiProject Agriculture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of agriculture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AgricultureWikipedia:WikiProject AgricultureTemplate:WikiProject AgricultureAgriculture articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spain, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spain on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpainWikipedia:WikiProject SpainTemplate:WikiProject SpainSpain articles
Interesting that if I dare (as I did at what is now Talk:Asturian Mountain cattle#Requested moves) to suggest renaming something as naturally ambiguous as Asturian Mountain and Asturian Valley to more sensible names (and consensus goes along with me eventually), it generates an enormous torrent of activistic sourcing attempts to "prove me wrong", none of which contribute in any way to article improvement. When I then do a large amount of source digging, for the benefit of the same "breed article editing" editors who claim I'm just some interloper who "doesn't work on breed articles" (despite the fact that I work on them quite often), absolutely zero activity from the same people occurs, and the article is not improved for 8 months running, no matter how many sources I find for them to use. This is not an isolated case. That's very, very curious. — SMcCandlish ☺☏¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼ 08:46, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]