Talk:Aston Cantlow

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Warwickshire

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Warwickshire, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Warwickshire. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Please also feel free to join in the discussions on the project's talk page.WarwickshireWikipedia:WikiProject WarwickshireTemplate:WikiProject WarwickshireWikiProject Warwickshire articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Renovation costs battle with the Church

Administrators, is it felt that this matter is suitable for a work of encyclopedic nature. A senrtence has ben aded to the article with a link to a national newspaper report of the time. Views became very heated on both sides of the argument of this case and as in most cases I'm not sure the newspaper article covers all of the aspects and options open to both parties at various stages of a lentghy litigation process. I was aware of this case and decided not to mention it as I felt that it is not really the place here to cover the legal arguments in a fair and objective way to both sides. I have not removed the referemnce but thought I would open the argument up and see if a policy existed on this type of entry.Argrogan (talk) 17:58, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Aston Cantlow. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120719065753/http://www.chancelrepair.org/2.html to http://www.chancelrepair.org/2.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:05, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]