A fact from Ashley Jade appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 9 July 2023 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music
Mainly because of weak promotional pushes and lack of strong public relations, the album did not get a fair chance at charting on the Billboard 200 Albums chart.
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Overall: @Launchballer: I see this was deleted in 2018 has been outside of mainspace since that time, and that you expanded the recovered deleted version. I have some concerns, mainly that the citation seems a little weak and I don't think reliable enough for this purpose. I am trying to understand what makes this interesting - she was in a film? Are the two related? There doesn't seem to be an article for the film Cheeky and I wonder if it's noteworthy enough to allow for an interesting hook. Bungle(talk • contribs)15:53, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I think ALT1 is better, as it at least has something relatable. She only just made it too by the looks of it! The sentence seems a little tongue-twisting towards the end though, so I may suggest perhaps:
As the focus is not necessarily on the fact that it specifically won the short film award, I think we can shuffle it around a little so it flows better? The archive BBC reference supports her involvement in the film and her singles debut is officially recognised too. Bungle(talk • contribs)21:31, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
In which case I think that's fine for ALT2. I'd have liked to have seen a better citation for the birth year than a 2005 blog post, though a search seems to concur with the birth year none the less. As it's a BLP, it'd be good to get something firmer if possible. Bungle(talk • contribs)17:13, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The casual nature of the post is less than ideal and a firmer citation would still be advantageous, but I can't see anything elsewhere that suggests it's wrong, hence it would be preferable to use something firmer, but I don't think for the purposes of this DYK it needs to be mandated. Bungle(talk • contribs)18:47, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Launchballer: I see this was deleted in 2018 has been outside of mainspace since that time, and that you expanded the recovered deleted version. I have some concerns, mainly that the citation seems a little weak and I don't think reliable enough for this purpose. I am trying to understand what makes this interesting - she was in a film? Are the two related? There doesn't seem to be an article for the film Cheeky and I wonder if it's noteworthy enough to allow for an interesting hook. Bungle (talk • contribs) 15:53, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
In which case I think that's fine for ALT2. I'd have liked to have seen a better citation for the birth year than a 2005 blog post, though a search seems to concur with the birth year none the less. As it's a BLP, it'd be good to get something firmer if possible. Bungle (talk • contribs) 17:13, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
