Talk:Ash Vale

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Surrey Mid‑importance

	Surrey portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Surrey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Surrey on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SurreyWikipedia:WikiProject SurreyTemplate:WikiProject SurreySurrey-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Population

Can anyone provide a reliable reference for the population size of 9,000? I could not find one so I have put in the 2001 Census figure instead. Ginyild (talk) 15:11, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quite right, obviously with its direct London service station people often say they are from Ash Vale, but Ash Wharf is split indistinctly between both stations, so should be mentioned in the Ash article as it is a very small neighbourhood per Template:UK_Places in that civil parish.Adam37 (talk) 13:33, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Parliamentary constituency

This is given as Guildford, but http://www.guildford.gov.uk/GuildfordWeb/Council/Elections/Borough+Council+Elections.htm suggests it should be Surrey Heath. Have recent boundary changes affected this? 86.5.94.149 (talk) 12:38, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That council is up for elections in thirds; it is still the relevant council (Council page on Ash Parish and as far as I am aware MP's constituency.

Photos - should be in Ash Value

The location of both photos in the infobox is actually outside of the boundary of Ash Vale, at least according to the map on the Ash Parish Council website: http://www.ashpcsurrey.gov.uk/maps/ashwards.htm. If anyone has any photos of places that are actually in Ash Vale, they might be more appropriate than the current choices. Stripybadger (talk) 11:56, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ash Vale. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101024163226/http://www.getsurrey.co.uk/news/s/2080377_award_for_mother_who_transformed_her_village to http://www.getsurrey.co.uk/news/s/2080377_award_for_mother_who_transformed_her_village

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:03, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]