Talk:Arvīds Pelše

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group.

Latvia High‑importance

	Latvia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latvia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Latvia related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LatviaWikipedia:WikiProject LatviaTemplate:WikiProject LatviaLatvia
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

A crime in Latvia?

Near the end of the article, it mentions that, "[n]owadays, Pelše ir [sic] regarded by many Latvians as a sort of a traitor for his dare to speak Russian and to live in Russia(a crime in Latvia)." Leaving aside the fact that the "ir" part has been in there for over two years without being edited, is it really a crime in Latvia to have spoken Russian and lived in Russia? I would assume that it's not a legal offense, so in that case, how should it be put?

The original version as added on 10 January 2010 was "Nowadays, Pelše ir [sic] regarded by many Latvians as a sort of a traitor for his efforts in condemning Latvian folk culture during his reign." I believe the "crime" aspect comes from his rejection of his own culture in favor of Russian (or Soviet) culture, so perhaps a better way to put it would be, "Today, Pelše is viewed by many Latvians as a traitor because of his pro-Russian policies and rejection of Latvian language and culture."

Of course, the section isn't cited at all, so it should probably get axed regardless unless somebody can find a citation for it, or it turns out Wikipedia policy says "public opinion" does not require citations. ChristopherGregory (talk) 14:22, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]