Talk:Arts criticism

This article was nominated for deletion on 9 July 2008. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Aesthetics

Deletion template

I shall improve the article. Though what can be regarded as OR on there I haven't the slightest clue. The content seems to me, to be of the most uncontroversial nature. --bodnotbod (talk) 20:03, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Citation dump

Some links revealed after a search on "criticism of the arts" and "arts criticism". Some may only be of use to prove the term has the meaning you ascribe it, but still:

Book review: Writings on Art and Literature by Sigmund Freud
Encyclopedia Britannica results - it also has a full article on "Criticism of the Arts", though not online.
Google Book Search results
Same again, different search term
Whatever Happened to Regional Critics? - Wall Stree Journal on the rise of bloggers in arts criticism, and the impending disappearance of the newspaper critic.
Squandered Tears - a similar article.
General articles on criticism from the same site
Google search of the same site

I hope these will be of some help. Steve ^{T • C} 19:57, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Arts criticism. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080506224924/http://www.temple.edu/JAAC/ to http://www.temple.edu/jaac/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:00, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Video games

Video games have been increasingly regarded as an art form. Should we include gaming criticosm in the list? Dr. Johnny (talk) 21:41, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]