This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skyscrapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles that relate to skyscrapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkyscrapersWikipedia:WikiProject SkyscrapersTemplate:WikiProject SkyscrapersSkyscraper
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Cleveland, the scope of which includes Cleveland and the Greater Cleveland Area. If you would like to join us, please visit the project page; if you have any questions, please consult the FAQ.ClevelandWikipedia:WikiProject ClevelandTemplate:WikiProject ClevelandCleveland
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ohio, which collaborates on Ohio-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to current discussions.OhioWikipedia:WikiProject OhioTemplate:WikiProject OhioOhio
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture
The building is 367 feet and completely changes the tallest buildings in Cleveland topics page. As such, that list now sits incomplete because of your negligence. As a Cleveland resident and historian, that lack of regard for my city is totally unacceptable and wholly unwarranted to anyone searching for information on the structure. You can quibble the semantics in your little discussion groups about your pseudo editor credentials, the point is this topic entry is relevant. I have read the article several times and there is nothing unfactual about it. It is more than on par with other overbloated crap on this platform, which purports to be topical and inclusive. At any rate, it references more than is demonstrable for such a short blurb. Just publish the damn thing and stop with your brinksmanship. 184.56.48.200 (talk) 18:12, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]