Talk:Articulata hypothesis
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Requested move 8 October 2024
[edit]
It has been proposed in this section that Articulata hypothesis be renamed and moved to Articulata (superphylum). A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil. Please use {{subst:requested move}} . Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly. |
Articulata hypothesis → Articulata (superphylum) – The title "Articulata hypothesis" is misleading, as its true subject isn't the hypothesis, but the taxon. What's more, any taxon named "Articulata" is part of a hypothesis. Now it's true that there is no ancestor taxon that we can use to disambiguate here, as the parent is Protostomia, which is an ancestor of Articulata (Brachiopoda) and Articulata (Cyclostomata) too. Hence we use the rank. The other 3 Articulatas are all below phylum. Grey Clownfish (talk) 07:21, 8 October 2024 (UTC)