Talk:Arthur Winnington-Ingram

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

University of Oxford

	University of Oxford portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of Oxford, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the University of Oxford on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of OxfordWikipedia:WikiProject University of OxfordTemplate:WikiProject University of OxfordUniversity of Oxford articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Christianity: Anglicanism Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Anglicanism (assessed as Low-importance).

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Worcestershire Low‑importance

	Worcestershire portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Worcestershire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Worcestershire-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WorcestershireWikipedia:WikiProject WorcestershireTemplate:WikiProject WorcestershireWorcestershire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

POST WW.I

Did the Bishop come to regret his support for the war or support appeasement in the 1930's to avoid another war? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.22.209.148 (talk) 11:21, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Personal life

It's been claimed that Bishop Winnington-Ingram was gay. Is there any information on this? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.113.44.32 (talk) 15:15, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm reading Arthur Marshall at the moment, (I'll Let You Know - page 179-180 has information about this man) - and read this : "Other pleasantly recurring treats, also of a mainly moral kind, were the regular week-end visits to the school of the then Bishop of London, dear old, kindly old, indubitably wonky old Winnington Ingram, much loved by all. He preached of course, in our chapel on Sunday and, after pronouncing the Blessing at the altar, swung round, and dexterously extracted from his billowing canonicals a large gold watch and had a dekko at the enemy. And indeed he was operating on a tight time schedule for as soon as the service was over he repaired to our Natural History Museum which stood close by and there, unsuitably seated amongst pressed grasses and cases of spread-eagled moths and the skeleton of a singularly unattractive horse, he received any boy who cared to call on him solo, and very many did, for a little moral uplift and spiritual encouragement at two minutes flat a head, though the more personable boys could usually count on a few seconds longer. " Marshall says he was an endless protester about 'morally unworthy' goings on, 'hot on the track of filth' -- took against Somerset Maugham's The Sacred Flame for example - "the whole 38 years of his London incumbency, he never once missed a meeting of the Public Morality Council's subcommittee on brothels, the air thick with tch tchs. He kept the Home Secretary on his toes ('I took him in 21 filthy books' ) "In 1934 he announced in the Lords , muddle-headed to the last, that he would like to make a fire of all contraceptives 'and dance round it' "

I recall a few years ago on Ian Hyslop's TV programme, "Canterbury Tales" (on Church of England in the 20th century) that Ian put the words more precisely as "all the condoms in the land" as what he wanted to burn. (Specifying male contraceptives here.)Cloptonson (talk) 22:42, 21 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's particularly Marshalls use of the words 'indubitably wonky' that makes me see this as Marshall saying the Bishop was homosexual - the word 'wonky' I believe in Marshalls use, has this meaning. 92.13.57.222 (talk) 12:37, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In The Orton Diaries, Orton quotes a Mr. George Greeves (1900-1984) who when telling him an anecdote, mentions that in 1936: "'I gave a party,' he [Greeves] said, 'all the fucking queers for miles flocked in. I believe we even invited the Bishop of fucking London but he had the piles and couldn't come.'" The Bishop of London in 1936 was Winnington-Ingram.--Britannicus (talk) 23:12, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article Confirmation of bishops says that there was some disorder at his confirmation; was that because of his sexual orientation? I think the disorder should be mentioned and explained. J S Ayer (talk) 03:09, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The present article on Confirmation of bishops does not mention Winnington-Ingram, I find, when I tried to see what the nature of the 'disorder' was. This word I often think of as meaning disruptive protest behaviour in a church ceremony, such as the anti-Ritualist protests by John Kensit who was active in the decade Winnington-Ingram became Bishop of London.Cloptonson (talk) 19:23, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rereading these comments I would stand by my suggestion of disorder being protests. It's extremely unlikely, given homosexual behaviour between men was then criminalised and imprisonable, as highlighted by the then-recent Oscar Wilde case, that anyone would make a public protest alleging a bishop was homosexual, and they would be risking a slander suit were they wrong.Cloptonson (talk) 18:41, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Arthur Winnington-Ingram. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080505002217/http://www.oxfordhouse.org.uk/template.php?ID=4&PageName=history to http://www.oxfordhouse.org.uk/template.php?ID=4&PageName=history

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:56, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]