This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States courts and judges, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States federal courts, courthouses, and United States federal judges on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United States courts and judgesWikipedia:WikiProject United States courts and judgesTemplate:WikiProject United States courts and judgesUnited States courts and judges
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
This article is a stub, and needs to be expanded. Fortunately, Spatt's slavery ruling, is the first in US federal criminal trial regarding double damages, applicable only to civil cases, aside from its very first to imprison bid fishes.--Florentino floro (talk) 08:25, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Personally I think some more general information about the judge himself would be helpful. One ruling on a case doesn't really tell us about Spatt. maxsch (talk) 15:01, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Before I added this important on jurists contain a) some notable opinions and b) landmark cases handled, inter alia. See: Conchita Carpio-Morales[1];John G. Roberts
[2], and former UK Deputy high court Judge David Pannick. I could have just put this Spatt decision down as Some notable opinions. But, it is rather a first one, and this is a mere stub, so empty and just starting. So, I decided to add just very short edit on this, to expand this article, as suggested by the stub, leaving to the readers, the opening of links, if they desire further info.--Florentino floro (talk) 05:10, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
