Talk:Art of the 2019–2020 Hong Kong protests
 | A fact from Art of the 2019–2020 Hong Kong protests appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 18 January 2020 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
 | The contents of the Chinazi page were merged into Art of the 2019–2020 Hong Kong protests. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
 |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
resources
[edit]- Khong, En Liang (6 December 2019). "Hong Kong and the art of dissent". Financial Times.
- Art and Freedom in the Hong Kong protests. Deutsche Welle. 3 December 2019 – via YouTube.
- "Shiba, Pepe the Frog, and protest pig: Internet memes come to life at Hong Kong rally". Straits Times. AFP. 8 December 2019.
- "The Powerful Images of Hong Kong protests". BBC. December 12, 2019.
- "Giraffe Leung: the artist who framed the scars left by months-long protests in Hong Kong". Hong Kong Free Press. April 12, 2020.
- Wong, Hong-shun (June 30, 2020). "Where satire meets protest art: Posters call on Hong Kong to march against security law on handover anniversary". Coconuts. Retrieved July 2, 2020.
- "'GFHG, SDGM': Hong Kong netizens reimagine illegal slogan as protesters find workarounds". Hong Kong Free Press. 3 JULY 2020.
{{cite web}}: Check date values in:|date=(help)
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 21:51, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
.jpg){kind=link}
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 09:36, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Chinazi artical
[edit]I think that there is sufficient information on zh:赤納粹#旗幟 for it to be made into its own artical. (Made discussion at suggestion of User:RoySmith) — RealFakeKimT 16:16, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 07:06, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
Re: "Tagging with overlink due to excessive links to Chinese language"
[edit]Just a FYI heads-up regarding this edit: Most China/Taiwan topic articles use the {{zh}} template for instances of Chinese-language text, for two reasons:
- To assist non-human machine readers (such as web trawler bots, and screen readers for the disabled)
- To ensure correct Chinese font display in W3C compliant web browsers
For example, if you are browsing on Windows 7 or later in an up-to-date version of Firefox, Chrome, Opera or Edge, (Chinese: 文宣組) should display using a Microsoft YaHei font (i.e. the "mainland China" font), while (Chinese: 文宣組) would display using a Microsoft JhengHei font (i.e. the "Taiwan/Hong Kong" font). Because each different Chinese-speaking entity has a different governmental body regulating how glyphs are displayed, characters such as 組 (which look slightly different depending on region, with one variant using 糸 and another using 幺 with three dots) need to be appropriately marked to use China or Taiwan/HK fonts depending on the topic of the article. For this reason, usage of the {{zh}} template is encouraged by WP:MOS-ZH. --benlisquareT•C•E 19:41, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
- But it seems that you didn't answer your own question... -- Ohc ¡digame! 06:34, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
Scholarly Commentary Edits
[edit]Hi everyone,
The Article is rather factual and descriptive.
I am exploring into how art influenced the Hong Kong Protests and I've added in more scholarly commentary to proof that art has its influence. I've cited some sources, and I'll be adding in more information.
Just so you know there will be more edits forthcoming.
Thank you.
BubblesOscar (talk) 05:21, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 16:37, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
