Talk:Art Loss Register

This article was nominated for deletion on 15 June 2017. The result of the discussion was keep.

Crime and Criminal Biography Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Databases (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Databases, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.DatabasesWikipedia:WikiProject DatabasesTemplate:WikiProject DatabasesDatabases articles

Visual arts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles

Perhaps worth adding?

The following is relevant, but I haven't figured out how to incorporate it:

UK Parliament, House of COmmons: Select Committee on Culture, Media and Sport Minutes of Evidence, Examination of witnesses (Questions 240 - 248), 18 April 2000, Julian Radliffe, OBE.

Perhaps it will become useful as this article develops? --Tenmei (talk) 00:58, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Extending the article

Does anyone know of any discussions of the ethics of the revenue model of the Art Loss Register which holds information of public interest with possible serious legal consequences if not accessed, yet requires substantial payments to access it?truthordare (talk) 18:36, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Art Loss Register. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:40, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

9309093377

Pravin 2409:4042:2C96:B5D7:0:0:1A49:BA06 (talk) 15:58, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reverting contributions

Yesterday it took me 2 hours to make contributions to this article. I added new sections and updated old entries and dead links. Edwardx removed all my text and reset the article to the outdated version. - Why? - I was planning to edit the article further today with quotations, links etc. MeCorbeau (talk) 09:31, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

MeCorbeau All of the information is still there in the article history (click on "View history" at the top), so it will be easy to add it again. But please cite new inforation as you add it, not later! Edwardx (talk) 12:50, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]