This article is within the scope of WikiProject Caucasia, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.CaucasiaWikipedia:WikiProject CaucasiaTemplate:WikiProject CaucasiaCaucasia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
Salam Aleykum WikiEditor1234567123, i just noticed that you found the Dadaev source we talked about, i checked the book and there is no mention of Arsiko being Ingush at all. Dudarov's theory shouldn't be mentioned at all since he is clearly biased and misuses the Dadaev source. Goddard2000 (talk) 16:05, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Well both Dudarov and Khozhaev could be considered biased as they are interested parties. The text already says that although the origins of Arsiko isn't clear, Ingush historian Dudarov holds opinion of him being Ingush. WikiEditor1234567123 (talk) 16:34, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Dudarov is biased, Khozhaevs theory is mentioned by Dadaev. This article shouldn't mention that Arsiko is Ingush at all since Dudarov falsely attributed this claim to Dadaev who made no mention of Arsiko being Ingush. In fact like i said Dadaev reiterated Khozhaev's belief that Arsiko was the Dishni Arsanuko. Goddard2000 (talk) 16:37, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
