Talk:Arsenura armida

Arsenura armida was nominated as a Natural sciences good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (November 11, 2013). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

Untitled

Added a bunch of content recently. I'll be proofreading and editing it a lot over these next few days, please feel free to message me if you have any suggestions/recommendations. Jabes808 (talk) 20:39, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I made some grammatical and wikipedia edits. Ashleynlin (talk) 19:29, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I added a few links that would help the article --Vpandrangi (talk) 19:32, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Good info! I changed the headings to fit the wikipedia standard of only capitalizing the first word. I also made some grammatical edits and removed a sentence from the lead since it was stated in Interactions with humans later on. Future edits could be on predator and prey information.

Wmhua (talk) 17:37, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I made some more grammatical edits. I also added hyperlinks to information that I thought were useful in clarifying your article. I also clarified the eclosion section. Some suggestions would be to be more clear about when you are talking about the larvae and when you are talking about the adult butterflies (particularly in the eclosion section). Further additions could include mating systems of the butterfly, and mating behaviors like territoriality. I also think providing a picture of the moth would be great. Ichooxu (talk) 03:04, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Great job on the addition! I think the article looks very good, I added som information in the interactions with humans section and did some minor changes on the body of the article. Aliciacanas (talk) 23:44, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Arsenura armida/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: FunkMonk (talk · contribs) 07:01, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Too many missing citations, please fix this before renominating. FunkMonk (talk) 07:01, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Mr. FunkMonk, Thanks so much for taking your time to review, I appreciate it. I've made a few changes, mainly, adding more inline citations and fleshing out the lead. I was wondering if you could provide some more feed-back now on any more necessary revisions for GA? Thanks! Jabes808 (talk) 21:11, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Arsenura armida. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:02, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]