Talk:Ars Poetica (Horace)

Latin Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latin, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Latin on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LatinWikipedia:WikiProject LatinTemplate:WikiProject LatinLatin articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Philosophy: Literature / Aesthetics / Ancient Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Philosophical literature
	Aesthetics
	Ancient philosophy

Anthropology: Oral tradition

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anthropology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anthropology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnthropologyWikipedia:WikiProject AnthropologyTemplate:WikiProject AnthropologyAnthropology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by Oral tradition taskforce.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 14:45, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Chronological Error?

Can the claim that the ars poetica originates with Horace be referenced or qualified? I'm certainly no expert, but Aristotle's "Poetics" (which has also been less commonly translated as Ars Poetica) is writeen about 200 years earlier, and the Wikipedia entry on Aristotle (under Aesthetic Writings) says as much.

Can someone support the claim that Horace's Ars Poetica is written in circa 18 B.C.? I have here a Cambridge Greek and Latin Classics book by Niall Rudd, which states that the Ars poetica is written in c. 10 B.C. Shanechan

Aristotle's "Poetics" was indeed written over three hundred years before Horace's work (Aristotle died in 322 B.C.). However, ars poetica means "art of poetry", and Horace was the first writer to approach poetry as a craft (not with just theory, as Aristotle did). Therefore, I'd say its okay to give the credit to Horace.

As far as the claim of the date, the Norton Anthology suggests 10 B.C., and that's the only date I can find elsewhere with any consistency.
I'd also like to pose a question. Should Horace's ars poetica have its own page? It seems to warrant one. I think that a more detailed historical summary of the work, why Horace's views on poetry were different than Plato and Aristotle, as well as the ars poetica's impact on scholarship through the middle ages, would be beneficial. I'm also thinking about adding some details on the decorum section; its only one line right now. DerelictDante (talk) 04:49, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There are indications in AP that it might have been written as early as in 24 BC. 91.79.51.78 (talk) 07:25, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No Bird Sing

Its a bit obscure but a hip-hop group called No Bird Sing made a song titled 'Ars Poetica' in 2009, probably not as well respected as the other poets mentioned, but still worth mentioning as contemporary artists. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.106.118.226 (talk) 09:47, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Really? Is that your personal value judgment?173.72.63.150 (talk) 23:29, 25 December 2013 (UTC)BobDobolina[reply]

Meriting Careful interpretation

In the "Horace" section, the words "ut pictura poesis" [as is painting so is poetry] are said to mean "…poetry, in its widest sense meaning 'imaginative texts,' merits the same careful interpretation that was in his day reserved for painting." This strikes me as being a personal opinion. I don’t think that it is generally agreed that Horace meant his words to mean that both poetry and painting have such a common characteristic. Deserving careful consideration is a quality that many things have in common: financial planning, naming children, travelling through dangerous lands, etc. etc. Also, why would painting merit careful consideration only in Horace’s "day" and not at other times? Maybe Horace meant that both poetry and painting should be pictorial and appeal to the visual imagination.Lestrade (talk) 16:14, 26 December 2013 (UTC)Lestrade[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ars Poetica (Horace). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050209203746/http://www.english.emory.edu:80/DRAMA/ArsPoetica.html to http://www.english.emory.edu/DRAMA/ArsPoetica.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:45, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]