Talk:Arroyomolinos de León
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Arroyomolinos de León. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060109120141/http://www.juntadeandalucia.es:80/institutodeestadistica/sima/htm/sm21009.htm to http://www.juntadeandalucia.es/institutodeestadistica/sima/htm/sm21009.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:34, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
Airburst source challenge
[edit]The meteoroid airburst reported in "Significant events" uses as its reference "Historical Records of δ-Arietids Superfireballs Over Spain" by J.M.Madiedo and J. M. Trigo-Rodríguez. In 2013, IP editor 123.211.29.185 added to the article this commentary on the reference:
- The authors of the conference paper making this claim provide no evidence that a meteor was seen by anyone outside the village.
- And the authors also provide no evidence that this proposed massive explosion was seen or heard by anyone in any of the nearby villages.
Since the reference is still used in the Meteor air burst article, where it's presumably been more visible to SMEs, I'm giving the reference the benefit of the doubt and taking the challenge out of the article itself, but moving it to here in case anyone wants to pursue it further. NapoliRoma (talk) 23:08, 20 February 2024 (UTC)