Talk:Arrowsmith (novel)

Novels Low‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Books

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook

How should we indicate that the book is now in public domain?

Since it was published in 1925, the US copyright has expired. How should we indicate this in the article? https://www.nytimes.com/2018/12/29/books/copyright-extension-literature-public-domain.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by Glubbdrubb (talk • contribs) 15:03, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Isn't this novel about d'Herelle's life?

If we go to this subject:

http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Felix_d%27Herelle

We read that Arrowsmith is based on Felix d'Herelle's life. Perhaps this point should be added, as I don't see such mention in Arrowsmith (novel).

Shushinla 03:20, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Arrowsmith cover.jpg

Image:Arrowsmith cover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 07:52, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The fair use thing makes no sense because this book was written in 1925 and that image is presumably from the same time period. The copyright is null and void. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.168.197.142 (talk) 09:05, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Arrowsmith cover.jpg

Image:Arrowsmith cover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:19, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Trivia section

The trivia section(witch is discouraged anyway)incorrectly statesthat the title of this book was the inspiration for the name of the band Aerosmith. The Aerosmith page however says that "The name had popped into his head after listening to Harry Nilsson’s album Aerial Ballet... ...Initially, Kramer’s bandmates were nonplussed; they all thought he was referring to the "boring" Sinclair Lewis novel they were forced to read in high school English class" So I'm deleting it.--Sir Joe Cool (talk) 04:46, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Arrowsmith (novel). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160130211650/http://mercurytheatre.info/md5/390203 to http://www.mercurytheatre.info/md5/390203

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:19, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]