Jump to content

Talk:Arnold Worldwide/Archives/2012

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Fair use rationale for Image:Awp logo.gif

Image:Awp logo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 07:04, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Possible references

I've moved these from the article. SmartSE (talk) 17:24, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

As requested...

I have taken a look at this as requested on my talk page. Personally, I think the "Notable clients" and "Notable work" sections are self-serving and spammy, particularly (in the case of the client list) when unreferenced. Apart from that, tone and content look OK. – ukexpat (talk) 15:53, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

Cheers for taking a look. I kinda agree but they are mostly independently sourced and as Vacassel pointed out, the clients and work are what define a PR company. It might be better if all the clients were prose and in the work section, but this might make it more promotional... It's certainly better than it was before though. SmartSE (talk) 16:28, 16 February 2011 (UTC)