Talk:Arne Slettebak/GA1

GA Review

Passed. Ldm1954 (talk) 23:01, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Sgubaldo (talk · contribs) 20:25, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Ldm1954 (talk · contribs) 22:23, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I will review this shortly. However, one thing strikes me immediately -- notability! As currently structured this is unclear. Did he get any major awards? Where is there a good source of his publications and citations? What papers by others demonstrate his impact, beyond the orbituary? I will be happier if you handle those first as I am not comfortable about doing a GAR when notability is not 200% obvious. Ldm1954 (talk) 22:23, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No major awards that I'm aware of. I couldn't find a source that listed all his publications and citations in on place. I sent this article through AfC a while ago, but my thought process at the time on his notability was that he scraped through by being director of two observatories, a member of the International Astronomical Union and a councilor (and I believe therefore also a memebr) of the American Astronomical Society. I suppose I'm not opposed to AfD if you think it's needed. Sgubaldo (talk) 23:56, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

He may scrape by, and normally we don't require proof. However, I think for GA we need more. Can you do an ISI search or simiar? Maybe a boring hand count of his pubs via GS? Ldm1954 (talk) 00:04, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, I'll have a look sometime this week. Sgubaldo (talk) 13:10, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Using Google Scholar, I counted 89 items between books, papers and other publications. 2 pubs with 500+ citations, 3 with 300+, 7 with 100+, several more between 50-100. Sgubaldo (talk) 19:45, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please count his h-factor. Make a list of how many cites for each then sort (e. g. Excel) Ldm1954 (talk) 20:45, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hopefully I've done this correctly. Counting from the link above, h-index seems to be 38. Sgubaldo (talk) 15:35, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I will accept this as passing WP:NPROF #C1 with the added notability he has from the observatory etc. Please give me a few days and I will go over the page. Ldm1954 (talk) 15:40, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please revise

Please include a cite to his PhD thesis, ideally an online pdf or if not that then a link to a copy at the library of his uni.
Vienna University should either be "University of Vienna" per the WP, or the German language term.

Ldm1954 (talk) 13:30, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done both, @Ldm1954. Sgubaldo (talk) 14:17, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

One more. I do not understand the placement of [1] after his name in the Career section, it seems to be misplaced. [2] has his parents info. Ldm1954 (talk) 21:18, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Sgubaldo, I have been slow. If you can fix this last one I will approve the GA. Ldm1954 (talk) 20:24, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ldm1954. [1] is to source that his middle name is Edwin, which [2] doesn't do. I've placed [2] at the end of that sentence too. Sgubaldo (talk) 20:30, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GAR section

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
a (reference section): b (inline citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.