Talk:Army of Revolutionaries

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Army of Revolutionaries article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Syria Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Syria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Syria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SyriaWikipedia:WikiProject SyriaTemplate:WikiProject SyriaSyria articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Kurdistan Low‑importance

	Kurdistan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Kurdistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Kurdistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.KurdistanWikipedia:WikiProject KurdistanTemplate:WikiProject KurdistanKurdistan articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Asian / Middle East / Post-Cold War C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Asian military history task force
	Middle Eastern military history task force
	Post-Cold War task force

Free Syrian Army

They have been fighting against the Free Syrian Army in Ifrin and Aleppo. The citation added that they are part of the Free Syrian Army mentions that they formed in May 2015 as part of the Free Syrian Army and then joined the Syrian Democratic Forces. They are not part of the Free Syrian Army. Since they are fighting the FSA and are in the SDF. 83.93.56.252 (talk) 11:43, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Name of JaT

I do not see sources using the name "Army of Revolutionaries" in any large amount. As such, I believe we should move the article to "Jaysh al-Thuwar", as per WP:COMMONNAME. Here are ten sources using "Jaysh al-Thuwar" to refer to the name of this formation, including both sources focusing on them and others. http://www.aymennjawad.org/2021/02/jaysh-al-thuwar-component-of-the-syrian https://www.thedefensepost.com/2018/03/06/sdf-fighters-redploy-efrin-isis-deir-ezzor/ https://www.understandingwar.org/sites/default/files/The%20Road%20to%20ar-Raqqah%20ID.pdf https://www.businessinsider.com/isis-is-making-gains-near-syrias-border-with-turkey-2015-12?jwsource=cl

Including pro-Kurdish/pro-SDF forces: https://anfenglish.com/news/jaysh-al-thuwar-retreats-from-raqqa-and-goes-to-afrin-25314

In addition, a google search shows only one link on the first page of "Army of Revolutionaries" that relates to the subject, while "Jaysh al-Thuwar" yields all relevant results. As such, I believe that editors should be able to come to a consensus to change the article name. --TheAmericanWarlord (talk) 11:34, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ANF and Hawar use both names, and numerous variants of it, like "Jaish al Thuwar", "Revolutionary Forces", "Revolutionaries' Army", "Revolutionary Army", etc. Their English versions are not consistent in naming the group. Furthermore, many sources (including several of those used named above) actually use both names, i.e. "Jaysh al-Thuwar (Army of Revolutionaries)" or "Army of Revolutionaries (Jaysh al-Thuwar)". I can also show you reliable sources only using the English name, such as here, here, here, here, and here.
In general, both names and many alternate versions of them are common (for example, "Al-Thuwar Army", "Dschaisch al-Thuwar" and "Dschaisch ath-Thuwwar" are also in use). In such cases, the English translation is generally preferred for the English Wikipedia. Applodion (talk) 12:01, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for providing sources. I concur, the name can remain--TheAmericanWarlord (talk) 12:08, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]