Talk:Army Reserve Sustainment Command

Military history: North America / United States

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

Arsceditor (talk · contribs)

Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent.

Notability

No independent sources, nothing to show any widespread significant or importance. Is there any reason for this organization to have an article, or should it be turned into a redirect to 377 TSC? —C.Fred (talk) 17:22, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merge and redirect. — Jeff G. ツ (talk) 02:13, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Heraldry information

Does this need block-quoted and cited? We've got the blanket PD notice, but the material in that section is clearly copied wholesale from http://www.tioh.hqda.pentagon.mil/Catalog/HeraldryMulti.aspx?CategoryId=7106&grp=2&menu=Uniformed%20Services. —C.Fred (talk) 02:32, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That sounds reasonable. — Jeff G. ツ (talk) 02:49, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]