This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia
Thanks, Joe -- most of the current bold face is from the style sheet, and I'm hoping it won't be so glaring once some more text is added. TheronJ12:50, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I think this article may be ambiguously named. The article refers to the appellate decision, 232 Cal. App. 3d 1060 [1], but this decision actually only used Armstrong's last name. However, I discovered that the lower court decision from August 10, 1984, in the Los Angeles Superior Court include Armstrong's full name in the case name: Church of Scientology of California v. Gerald Armstrong, case number C 420153. See Ford v. Superior Court, 188 Cal. App. 3d 737, 740 (Cal.App. 1986). Perhaps the ambiguity is too unimportant to justify changing the title of the article. Just wanted to point it out. Taiwan prepares (talk) 11:58, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
