Talk:Armiansk
Appearance
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
![]() | This article contains broken links to one or more target anchors:
The anchors may have been removed, renamed, or are no longer valid. Please fix them by following the link above, checking the page history of the target pages, or updating the links. Remove this template after the problem is fixed | Report an error |
NPOV dispute
[edit]This page seems to have a pro-Ukrainian bias, I think it is better to reword the phrasing to make it more neutral. Nar 2608 (talk) 13:23, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
- What is biased about it? —Michael Z. 00:36, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
- The use of strong terms in the introduction such "illegal occupation" was what made me make this comment: for the example I gave before, simply saying "occupation" would be enough and then the term could be linked to an article discussing the occupation in a more detailed manner rather than simply stating "oh it's illegal" Nar 2608 (talk) 14:11, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
- Stating the fact is not “strong” or “biased.” It is neutral. —Michael Z. 20:59, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
- Exactly. Stating a fact regognised by International Law is not "biased" even though in Russian mindset facts are often lies and war is peace. --Smörre (talk) 11:45, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
- The use of strong terms in the introduction such "illegal occupation" was what made me make this comment: for the example I gave before, simply saying "occupation" would be enough and then the term could be linked to an article discussing the occupation in a more detailed manner rather than simply stating "oh it's illegal" Nar 2608 (talk) 14:11, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
Edit warring
[edit]@No,see you at school, please respect WP:BRD and don’t edit-war.[1] —Michael Z. 03:32, 11 August 2023 (UTC)