Jump to content

Talk:Armageddon (2006)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleArmageddon (2006) has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Did You Know Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 24, 2008Good article nomineeListed
September 27, 2008Peer reviewReviewed
October 25, 2008Featured article candidateNot promoted
Did You Know A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on July 17, 2008.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that after years of inactivity, the Inferno match returned at the Armageddon (2006) pay-per-view event produced by World Wrestling Entertainment (participant M.V.P. pictured)?
Current status: Good article

Pre-GA review

[edit]
  • Background
    • Wikilink disqulaification.
    • "Theodore Long told Kennedy that he had found a SmackDown! superstar that had never faced Kennedy" sounds a little awkward to me. Could you possibly reword it?
    • You end up using both "Kennedy" and "Mr. Kennedy". Be consistent and pick one.
    • "threatened to him over with a hearse that appeared again" - do you mean "threatened to run him over"?
    • "Undertaker appeared in front of the car of which Kennedy was sitting in the drivers seat" - again, awkwardly worded. Consider rewording.
  • Event
    • "including the use of various moves" is too vague. Add a move or two that was performed.
    • Shouldn't "Paul London and Brian Kendrick, Blue Bloods" read "Paul London and Brian Kendrick, the Blue Bloods", grammatically speaking?
    • "Kendrick managed to get the pair off" sounds strange. Perhaps, "Kendrick managed to knock the pair off"
    • Change "between The Boogeyman versus The Miz." Don't use "between" and "versus" in the same phrase. It doesn't sound right. Either, "between The Boogeyman and The Miz." or "The Boogeyman versus The Miz."
    • "which causes for the wrestler applying the pin," is very awkwardly worded.
    • "brake" should be spelt "break".
    • "Helms controlled the most of it" should be "Helms controlled most of it"
    • Wikilink "swinging neckbreaker"
    • "The following was a" - should "match" not be inserted into the sentence?
    • Wikilink chokeslam and tombstone.
    • There shouldn't be an "e" on the end of "Santa Clause"
    • "which was portrayed" should read "who was portrayed"
    • Wikilink STFU
    • "kicked himself in his hear" - huh?
    • "Batista then hit the Batista Bomb onto Booker" - should be performed instead of hit.
  • Aftermath
    • "earned" should be "earn"
    • Wikilink disqualification

-- ♥NiciVampireHeart06:27, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Nici! I finished the review, all is completed. -- iMatthew T.C. 11:08, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Looks good, although you only had to wikilink one instance of "Singles match" in the results section... ♥NiciVampireHeart♥ 11
25, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Armageddon (2006)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Alright, the article's looking pretty good already but here are a few suggestions for improvement:

  • The event starred wrestlers from the SmackDown! brand: a storyline expansion of the promotion where employees are assigned to a wrestling brand under the WWE banner - I don't see a need for a colon instead of a comma.
  • The leading staged rivalry going into the event was between (David Bautista, Jr.) and King Booker (Booker Huffman) - should there be a "Batista" in there?
  • Then, on the December 15, 2006 edition of SmackDown! - we don't really need the "then" at the beginning.
  • Cena defeated Finlay in a non-title match after lifting Finlay up on his shoulders and slamming him to the mat, a move dubbed the FU, [10] - ??? End of a sentence missing?
  • The hearse drove to the ring, appearing to have nobody in the drivers seat to drive the car - "driver's seat".
  • The Undertaker appeared from the back of the hearse, as Kennedy sprung from the ring, immediately - what's happening immediately? If they're happening at the same time ("as"), then we don't need the "immediately".
  • On the December 15, 2008 edition of SmackDown! - if this is background, why are we whizzing two years into the future to 2008? ;)
  • ...which ended in neither wrestler winning the match - "neither" refers to only two wrestlers, but there are four in the match. Maybe say "neither team".
  • He threatened to run him over with a hearse that had appeared again - "the hearse", if it's the same one.
  • Oleg Prudius defeated Scotty 2 Hotty in a dark match, a non televised match - "non-televised".
  • The first match to air live was between Kane and Montel Vontavious Porter (MVP) - it's a new section, but it's still been stated above what MVP stands for, I don't think we need to spell it out again.
  • Same with the image caption. Exclude the "(MVP)" because there isn't any following usage.
  • The only way to win an Inferno match is by throwing your opponent into a fire that surrounds the ring on all four sides - using "your" is informal; say "by throwing one's opponent".
  • ...the only way to win and capture the titles, was by climbing a ladder - no comma needed.
  • Both men had different scenes in the match where they were in control - kind of awkward to read; can we reword?
  • ...where the only way to win was by throwing your opponent into a hearse and driving it out of the arena - again, don't use "your".
  • A back and forth match took place - "back-and-forth".
  • The Undertaker then opened the hearse door, exposing all the broken glass inside and Kennedy into the car and drove the hearse out of the arena to win the match - this sentence doesn't really make sense to me; maybe check if it's worded correctly.
  • The host of the contest was Santa Claus (who was portrayed by Big Dick Johnson) - no need for "who was".
  • Is "diva" capitalised? Main event matches section uses both ways, so pick one and change the other.

That's about it - the article will be on hold for seven days so good luck with the changes until then :) —97198 talk 09:50, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've completed your requests. Also, I'd like to state that sooner rather than later, I plan on adding the event's reception. -- iMatthew T.C. 11:22, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Could you do that before the GAN hold expires? Because that'd probably be better to satisfy the broadness GA criterion. —97198 talk 06:28, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Awesome. Just a couple more things:
  • Can we get a source for the statement "The Richmond Coliseum has a maximum capacity of 13,500, but that was reduced for Armageddon (2006)"?
  • I'm not sure we should use the customer poll from Amazon.com - it's not a reliable or accurate representation of fan opinion or the event's (or even DVD's) popularity.
97198 (talk) 13:58, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, SummerSlam (2003) just passed it's FAC, and there was a bit about the Amazon reception, so it seems fine. Also, I can't find any sources, but the Wikipedia article for the Richmond Coliseum says it can hold 13,500 people, and all pro-wrestling PPV's are reduced due to the stage. -- iMatthew T.C. 14:16, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I guess there aren't any Nielsen ratings or other similar figures available to determine popularity with fans, so this is really the closest we can get. And for the unsourced thing, I guess the information's not really controversial but it'd be good if you could find a source outside WP for the usual capicity being 13,500. —97198 (talk) 01:56, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Done. -- iMatthew T.C. 02:34, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Alrighty, nice work. I'm happy to promote to GA. —97198 (talk) 02:48, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure, but...

[edit]

I'm not sure, but shouldn't there be a mention of a clearly visible mat being used in the Last Ride Match (When Undertaker was thrown from the set_ —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tory88 (talkcontribs) 17:47, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Even if sourced, I don't think it would be notable. TJ Spyke 18:02, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]