Jump to content

Talk:Arm Holdings/Archives/2017

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on ARM Holdings. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:36, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Move to Arm Holdings

I propose to move the article to 'Arm Holdings' instead of 'ARM Holdings' and just have ARM holdings redirect to it in line with their current styling. I'll put in an 'Arm xxx' redirect to some other pages so they can be referred to easily using the non capitalized version but no other moves for the moment - actual moves like this can be done gradually as seems fit and might never happen for older things. Dmcq (talk) 11:36, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

Plus change category ARM Holdings to Arm Holdings. There's only a few entries in it. Dmcq (talk) 11:55, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

Should we change it to "Arm Limited"? This web page, https://www.arm.com/company says so and while Google still says "Arm Holdings" I can't locate it at the page. comp.arch (talk) 18:39, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
ARM Holdings is a holding company, while ARM Limited is the operational unit. I don't know when the change occurred (presumably with the purchase), but it seems like ARM Limited is more appropriate. Dbsseven (talk) 20:22, 18 October 2017 (UTC)