Talk:Arlington Mill Reservoir

United States: New Hampshire Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	New Hampshire portal This article is supported by WikiProject New Hampshire (assessed as Low-importance).

Lakes Low‑importance

	Lakes portal Arlington Mill Reservoir is within the scope of WikiProject Lakes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of lake-related articles on Wikipedia, using the tools on the project page. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LakesWikipedia:WikiProject LakesTemplate:WikiProject LakesLakes articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Arlington Mill Reservoir. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130803072027/http://www.granit.sr.unh.edu/ to http://www.granit.sr.unh.edu/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:26, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Public versus private access

To the anonymous editor who has been adding unsourced information about how to access the lake: Please do not restore your edits. If you feel your information should be in the article, please state your reasons here on the talk page first. Also, please take a look at WP:BRD and WP:SOURCES. Thank you, Ken Gallager (talk) 17:36, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The information regarding the public spaces are on the town of Salem, NH Tax map. We have cited and linked sources to where it states that its a public pond/reservoir. All of this is factual, public knowledge. Either from the Town's website/tax mapping or the Arlington Pond Protective Association. They do not allow you to link to a specific tax map property. But if you search any of the locations listed, You will see they are all listed as publicly owned. 64.223.134.136 (talk) 20:42, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your reply and taking the time to link to all the spots on the tax maps that back up your statements. Unfortunately, what you are showing is WP:Original research, where you are accessing a primary source developed for one purpose (tax assessments) and interpreting it for another (finding places to access a lake). You are drawing your own conclusions that the primary source documents do not explicitly state. (They do not say: "Here is a place that you can access Arlington Mill Reservoir.") This is why we can't include that information in the article, and why I will still have to revert your good-faith edits. Ken Gallager (talk) 12:35, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The other reason I am reverting is because you have undone all my other edits since your first one. If you do find a verifiable secondary source indicating the presence of public access sites, please enter it fresh; do not simply go back to your original edit. Thank you. Ken Gallager (talk) 12:38, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]