Jump to content

Talk:Arizona's 2nd congressional district

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Math doesn't add up

[edit]

I noticed that the demographic info box didn't make sense, so I tallied up everything. It comes out to 111.8%. You can't blame 11.8% in rounding of 6 categories (almost 2% each category), so someone fudged the numbers. -NordsternMN (talk) 18:19, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Arizona's 2nd congressional district. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:21, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Arizona's 2nd congressional district. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:32, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Map doesn't match text description of where district is in State of AZ

[edit]

District 2 includes Surprise? On the Map it doesn't. In the text it does. 67.183.47.242 (talk) 20:03, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Map is completely outdated

[edit]

The map posted is from the 2010s redistricting cycle, the 2020s puts this district in rural Northern Arizona, it's much different in composition to the AZ-02 of the 2010s which was in SE Arizona and included Tucson. Singh117 (talk) 01:47, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Land Area

[edit]

The geographical size is outdated (it's from the old second district). 184.98.53.107 (talk) 19:50, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]