Talk:Aris Thessaloniki F.C.

Greece Low‑importance

	Greece portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greece on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Football Low‑importance

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Fair use rationale for Image:Etien2.jpg

Image:Etien2.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 19:54, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In Turkey tour they played with Fener Bax? It should be Fenerbahce SK. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.171.98.69 (talk) 12:57, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

According to the official statistics by Superleague, the official organization for greek football, Aris F.C. is the second biggest club in Thessaloniki, the capital of Macedonia, and the fifth at the other parts of Macedonia and not first as indicated in the article. All information can be found at the online research results presentation. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.203.142.127 (talk) 19:38, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This research is totally unreliable. The sample is 1616 people. 110 people of the sample come from Xanthi (~7% of the sample) when Xanthi has 100.000 people (~1% of Greece's total population). 130 people of the sample were from Larissa (8% of the sample - ~2,5% of Greece's total population). 85 of the people asked are from Iraklion (~5% of the sample) when the total population of Iraklio is 300000 people (~2,7% of Greece total population). 120 people from Peloponnisos are asked (~7% of hte sample of 1616 people) while Peloponnisos has almost 1.2 million people (~11% of Greece's total population). 80 of the people that took part in this research come from Corfu (~5% of the sample) while Corfu has 110000 residents (~1% of Greece's total population).85.73.7.254 (talk) 18:59, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

what a mess

It doesn't deal at all with the two relegations and 80% of the text is about 1920s and 1930s. Also the notable players section is supposed to be about notable not all foreign players who played for the team --Ioannes Tzimiskes (talk) 16:32, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree so i removed some of them.I can't understand why players like Decamps,Fomubond,Taglani and Martinez are consider as notable...Ήμαρτον.

NPOV dispute

This article has huge neutrality issues. It is written entirely as a fan article. Just a few examples:

-"The leading star of Thessaloniki and untamed in the rest of Greece, Aris shone in all athletic activities. In water sports, in basketball and in track and field Aris was synonymous to being first, to being the Champion. ": This is not only melodramatic, but also unrelated to the article, which is about the FOOTBALL club, as well as completely unsupported by the facts.

-"The local championships he won were countless": They can certainly be counted, how about some numbers?

-"Beginning in 1923, when he won his first title, until 1959, when local tournaments ceased, the club rarely finished second or third.": Absolutely not true. The article says they only won 3 "championships", with only 2 more participating teams. And who is "he"?

-" Aris was even demoted to the Second Division twice, due to bad management". That is certainly an opinion of the authors. The club was relegated because of bad performance and hooliganist action by their fans, which brought the club's punishment.

-Also, the two recent relegations are only mentioned in passing.

-"With regard to a period that gave birth to the big stars that shone in the stadiums of that era. The Vikelidis brothers, like the Andrianopoulos brothers in Olympiakos, are names often remembered. The patriarch of the family, Kostas, the unsurpassed in technique midfielder Nikoforos, the “Human Tornado” as Kleanthis used to be known, and leaving for last, but certainly not least, the “Macedonian Armored Vehicle”, the youngest of the family, Kitsos, also known as the “Terrorist” of opponent goalkeepers and by many other nicknames that were given to him by the press. Let us not forget Aggelakis, whose football shoe was carried around by his admirers, Kaltekis, Papas, the Koloniari brothers, Katrantzos, Danelian, Koublis and so many others, most of who sent their spirits to guard present day ARIS.": Simply not serious enough!

-"a success that was underlined by the titan efforts of Vikelidis, Tsonas, Magras, Abrachamian, Siotis, Nikolaidis, Kaftatzis, Kaftatzis II, Liakopoulos, Vasiliadis, Velliadis and Koloniaris. These semi-gods led the god of war to the Champion’s throne for the third time.": Same thing.

-"But there came a day when all these giants of football that made ARIS such a great team stopped playing.": Same thing. Most of these players are completely non-notable.

-"Local newspapers “MACEDONIA”, “THE LIGHT”, “PEOPLE’S VOICE” as well as the Athenian papers wrote triumphant headlines to mark the “yellow’s” major success": References???

-"In the first match Aris played against Panathinaikos, who was rescued from contrition by referee Zapardas, who force the “yellows” to an unjust draw (1-1)": Again, this is a fan comment.

-"The “yellows” fans also take pride in the fact that Aris was the main domestic club of Greece's Euro 2004 goal scoring hero Angelos Charisteas.": Charisteas was playing in Germany at the time, not in Aris.

These are only some of numerous similar problems with this article. It must be entirely rewritten to meet wikipedia standards or deleted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Allinthebrain (talk • contribs) 23:54, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. The article is completely unreliable, with no references, and has clearly been written by fans. It needs to be changed radically.

(IWMYS (talk) 03:46, 10 April 2009 (UTC))[reply]

I also agree. This has been written by fans. I did some cleaning up, but it is still far from reliable. (GreekTiger (talk) 19:44, 11 April 2009 (UTC))[reply]

Aris Second Division Championship in 1998

Aris has also won a Second division championship in 1998. Do not delete it from the honours section.

rivals of aris

the statment tha olympiakos, panthinaikos and aek are rivals of aris its not true, these are just difficult games with big teams. These big teams can't be the rival of all teams the only teams that can be called rivals of aris is PAOK and maybe Iraklis in fact at olympiakos article, at the part of rivalies there is no mension of aris, and if olympiakos is not rival of aris the panathinaikos and aek there are not either

stop putting olympiakos aek and panathinaikos as rivals of aris, THEY ARE NOT —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikipaok (talk • contribs) 20:42, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

European games table

The table for all European games played currently uses background colours to give a quick indication of whether the team has won or lost. This is then augmented, for some reason, by a tick or a cross in a final column to indicate this again. I removed the ticks and crosses as this is stating the same information twice, but this was undone. The editor who did this commented on my talk page that this double marking system is used on the pages for other Greek clubs, but since none of these have reached good article status, let alone featured article I don't feel that this is a very good precedent to use. Dancarney (talk) 10:56, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

And, the editor who undid that is me. I believe that the ticks and crosses indicate more clearly the respective results than background colours do. Moreover, my undoing this certain edit had to do with intending to reach a uniform consensus for the Super League Greece teams' articles... Even if any of those articles reached "good article status, let alone featured article", that wouldn't mean that those articles are perfect and thus not to be ever edited in another way in the future. I just asked for a uniform system for the Super League Greece teams' articles, urging Dancarney to edit some other Super League Greece team's article in his intended way. Heracletus (talk) 18:58, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Examples: Iraklis_F.C.#Europe, Larissa_F.C.#European_competition_history, PAOK_FC#European_matches_panorama all use ticks and crosses. Olympiakos F.C. and AEK Athens F.C. have different single articles for their European matches: Olympiacos_F.C._in_Europe, AEK Athens F.C. in Europe, while Panathinaikos F.C. has only a very short section Panathinaikos_F.C.#European_campaigns. OFI Crete, a team now competing in Beta Ethniki, has a section with ticks and crosses, too, OFI_Crete#All_the_European_games. Heracletus (talk) 02:01, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Of course, no article is perfect, but I strongly suspect that any article using these ticks and crosses would fail a nomination for good article status, particularly since there is no explanation as to what the symbols actually mean. I've never seen this kind of usage of symbols in any medium reporting sports results, so why has this been invented here? Almost ever article on Greek football teams I've come across has been a horrendous mess, so I wouldn't be inclined to follow them. It is interesting that, though the articles are too in need of work, none of the P.O.K. club articles use this format. Dancarney (talk) 08:16, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's quite laughable to imply that you cannot understand what the tick and the cross stand for. Anyway, I did suggest -in your talk page- that you edit the other teams' articles removing the ticks and crosses, and if your edits stay - which implies there's some kind of consensus, come back and do the same here. Now, if you really wish so, I think I could create a nice "european matches" section with cute ticks and crosses for all the P.O.K. club articles, and come back and claim that there's consensus and you're like the odd one out. I did refer to those teams' page, too, kind of discrediting my "ticks and crosses to stay" argument to indicate there's no consensus. That doesn't mean you can use that as an argument to argue that since some teams' pages don't follow that format, that's the thing to do here, too. Or, then, I'd have to argue that you should create a page for the European matches of Aris first, much like the pages for Olympiakos and AEK {that's 2 out of 3 POK teams}. Heracletus (talk) 11:30, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Also, Cypriot teams' articles use the same format: APOEL_F.C.#European_competitions_record, Anorthosis_Famagusta_FC#European_competitions_record. However, Nea_Salamis_Famagusta_FC#European_participation does not. Heracletus (talk) 11:53, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am not implying that I do not understand the meaning of the ticks and crosses, merely that any use of symbols in an article needs an accompanying key. I also am making the point that the use of these symbols will prevent this article form achieving good article status, something that I'm sure you'll agree should be aimed for in the case of all articles. If you a precedent, why not start with the relevant section of the featured list, List of Birmingham City F.C. records and statistics. Dancarney (talk) 10:10, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

For the record, I believe these symbols are totally unneccesary, and tbh, it does take a while to work out what on earth they are for. People are not idiots; they can work out for themselves whether the team was eliminated or not by looking at the score! пﮟოьεԻ 5 7 09:14, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's a shame that you are an administrator, for your actions were totally uncalled for. Your argument about people not understanding what those symbols stood for seems to me totally silly; you took action while there was no consensus and there was an active section about it here and you will probably try to hide behind WP:BOLD. I took the time to indicate which pages shared the "crosses and ticks format", only to have it easier on you to know what to delete, so that you can make your point more widely "accepted"?

Also, Dancarney, you took the time to only delete what you didn't like from the other pages and cover it with "wow, an admin agrees with me, so whatever i may do, it will be ok"? If both of you really cared for the articles referenced here, you could have taken the time to improve those exact tables accordingly. And, no, removing the ticks and the crosses is not the same. All of those articles' tables miss the aggregate score for one.

However, User:Number 57, your actions were totally shameful, since you are an administrator. I would like to see how you will get away with doing whatever you think is right while there's no consensus and there's a hot topic on some other more controversial {and thus, more frequently visited and edited} talk page. Heracletus (talk) 19:49, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you're so upset, rather than engaging in personal attacks maybe you should see the relevant discussion on the Football project's talk page. Dancarney (talk) 20:00, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well, perhaps, you should have told me about it before? Still, all my previous arguments stand. If you had told me you about your making a new section on that talk page, perhaps, i could support my own case with my own arguments? Not to mention that i did point out the articles where there were no ticks and crosses, so WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS does NOT apply. I didn't just say that what i supported was the "right" thing, i did indicate there was no consensus. My arguments do stand, too, cause it all happened in one day, so i had no chance to even reply or something. Now, as for personal attacks, go jack off.

Also, you keep writing a lie, that List of Birmingham City F.C. records and statistics#Birmingham City in Europe is a featured list and thus, the thing to follow. However, it is a featured LIST, including the European games table, but not only that. Also, you must note how the table has changed since this article became a featured list as a whole... [1] to List of Birmingham City F.C. records and statistics#Birmingham City in Europe. It may still have no ticks and crosses, and the whole article may still be a featured list, but things like notes and stuff were added to it and its style was changed. Even so, it's a huge list as an article and i can see nowhere saying that any particular attention was given to the exact european games' table, other than that existing and being full with all the european games. Furthermore, you cannot really compare a table containing 4 seasons of the same competition and 12 games to a table containing 3 different competitions over 16 seasons and 27 games (while even the format of some competitions differs from season to season).Heracletus (talk) 12:47, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Line-up image

I've removed an image showing what puports to be the Aris line-up from the players section. As this will change game-by-game it is very recentist, and as such should be discouraged. Secondly, without sources explicitly stating line-up, formation, etc, (rather than compiling appearance data from the current season) this is original research. Ilikeeatingwaffles (talk) 08:33, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"Notable players"

Obviously, there are no standard (at least yet) criteria as to whom is notable. Also, every recent award in Greece does no justice to players before 1959, when the Championship format changed. I think that some criteria for inclusion would be, to include:

- national championship and cup winning squads
- players who were later managers of the club, as they spent their lives associated to the club and its fate,

however, there are also squads that were tied for the 1st place in the national championship (1980) or cup finalists or regional and/or local championships before 1959. Not to mention the squads that promoted the team back to Alpha Ethniki from the lower division, or the squad winning the cup of Greater Greece, or the squad that got the team into the new format of Alpha Ethniki in 1959 by securing the 6th place in the national championship of 1958-1959.

So, basically, where do we draw the line? Comments (in good faith) are requested.

Obviously, squads that got the team in Beta Ethniki are not notable (or could be in a negative way).... 46.177.37.19 (talk) 16:26, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

For this not to be original research, which is not allowed in Wikipedia, the criteria for who is notable must be established by a third party, not by editors. Many clubs have a 'Hall of Fame' or a 'Greatest Ever Team' published somewhere. If you look at football club articles that have made it to Featured Article status (e.g. Aston Villa F.C., Manchester City F.C.)you'll see that this is the way to go. Ilikeeatingwaffles (talk) 16:47, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The way to go is this:

Wikipedia:WikiProject_Football/Clubs

"Notable players sections

It may be useful to readers to have a list of players who have been of importance at a club, but any such list should have clear inclusion/exclusion criteria, and the section header should reflect such criteria. Any editor considering adding a player to such a list, or excising one, should be able to make such a decision on the basis of verifiable fact, not opinion or whim. Such criteria will vary according to the level at which the club plays, or has played. Players considered important to the history of the club, but who do not meet such criteria, can be referred to in the history section."

A team winning a cup or a championship is notable enough and the title is awarded by the relevant federation, a third party. There's no "hall of fame" yet, and as I have stated, "every recent award in Greece does no justice to players before 1959, when the Championship format changed".

Please, stop making disruptive edits, just based on wikipedia policies, removing stuff, asking for more sources and generally only focusing on this article among Greek teams, without any leniency.

You could actually start adding something relevant to this article, IF YOU REALLY WANT IT TO IMPROVE. Like, add to the team's history, write some text, do something else than just enforcing every policy you can think of or asking for people to add sources or remove stuff:

.

Your account is only renamed and you're Dancarney, and you always talk about the enforcement of policies and how it would lead to the article becoming like the articles in the "Good Article" category, and now, in the even better "Featured Article":

But, you never really add any content or really improve an article. Your edits seem like ones of a wikipedia-policies-enforcing bot with the difference they are targeted on only certain articles, like this one. You could like start from another Greek team article for a difference every once in a while, OR try to actually improve the article, not by just removing images, flags or whatever you deem unfit per wikipedia policy, but by adding something. Your edits are negative and targeted. You're not removing blatant vandalism, but, content that is (or, could be) unfit. Get a bot, or add something every once in a while. Two years have passed, but, I have not seen you doing anything much to get this article into good shape, or seen you nominate it for the "Good Article" status.

Your most recent edits on this article are:

12:04, 16 January 2012‎ Ilikeeatingwaffles (talk | contribs)‎ (96,909 bytes) (Added {{ref improve}} tag to article (TW))
12:03, 16 January 2012‎ Ilikeeatingwaffles (talk | contribs)‎ (96,875 bytes) (no flags in infoboxes - WP:MOSFLAG) 
22:04, 9 January 2012‎ Ilikeeatingwaffles (talk | contribs)‎ (88,122 bytes) (nickname shouldn't be first thing in lead)
22:02, 9 January 2012‎ Ilikeeatingwaffles (talk | contribs)‎ (88,124 bytes) (→Other information: replace table with text) 
21:56, 9 January 2012‎ Ilikeeatingwaffles (talk | contribs)‎ (88,642 bytes) (→Board of Directors: pretty sure that the ground isn't on the board)
21:53, 9 January 2012‎ Ilikeeatingwaffles (talk | contribs)‎ (88,772 bytes) (→Performance: {{splitto}} - cf List of Liverpool F.C. seasons - this section is massively and unweildy)
21:49, 9 January 2012‎ Ilikeeatingwaffles (talk | contribs)‎ (88,734 bytes) (Undid revision 470503220 by 46.177.2.152 (talk) contravenes WP:MOSICON - do not use images this way)
19:37, 9 January 2012‎ Ilikeeatingwaffles (talk | contribs)‎ (87,261 bytes) (→Honours: images go against WP:MOSICON)
13:24, 9 November 2011‎ Ilikeeatingwaffles (talk | contribs)‎ (81,392 bytes) (no flags in infoboxes - WP:MOSFLAG - for the umpteenth time!)
09:47, 25 October 2011‎ Ilikeeatingwaffles (talk | contribs)‎ (80,565 bytes) (no flags in infoboxes - WP:MOSFLAG) 
09:27, 31 August 2011‎ Ilikeeatingwaffles (talk | contribs)‎ (67,484 bytes) (→Notable former players: tag)

Please, do explain to me why you don't do the same thing for other Greek teams or do not add anything other than tags, remove flags and move stuff the way you'd like it (nicknames in the lead, table made into text)?

Heracletus (talk) 15:49, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oi. Comment on the content, not the contributor - Wikipedia:No personal attacks. This article is on my watchlist, don't remember why, and it's not your business why. I tidy up football articles all over the place, I'm not specifically targeting this article, it's just ended up on my watchlist for a reason I don't remember. Ilikeeatingwaffles (talk) 16:18, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Once again, just a totally unproductive comment. You edit SPECIFIC football teams articles, the ones that ACCIDENTALLY end up on your watchlist, by just "fixing" whatever violates wikipedia policies or your own artistic/personal preferences. Seriously, table into text is a productive edit? And, when anyone calls for comments, you just state how the article's current status is not at par with "Good" or "Featured" articles. Thank you, Captain Obvious. You could contribute. My 'allegations' were well-refenced, you just keep doing what I accuse you of.

Furthermore, I started my previous comment by pointing out that the way to go with "Notable Players" sections has already been set. But, please, keep adding tags and citing wikipedia policies, since it's the most you can do to improve any article. No fixing typo's, no adding stuff, just removing it, tagging it and converting it to your own style.

Thank you, you're very important. I rather question though that, even if I call you any names, you'll stop doing it. I think the original comment asks for comments in good faith, not comments citing that "Hey, this is original research unless you find third-party sources to support it." Thank you, noone else knew so. If you are only going to tidy up what's already there, stop citing articles that have already achieved good or featured status to others, or do something to really improve the articles you edit, OR get a bot.

Since you know those articles you stated have been featured and this has not, why not edit it alike to the articles you stated and just state the featured articles?? Last time, you referred to some article that's a list and has (or had) featured status. Great! Did you do anything to get the relevant sections of this article to be like the sections of the featured article you mentioned? NO. So, thank you, anyone who cares knows that this article is not yet officially "Good" or "Featured", that it should change to resemble "Good"/"Featured" articles and, especially about the "Notable Players" section, that there have to be clear criteria and the section header should reflect them. Yes, we can read wikiproject guidelines/wikipedia policies, too. Even unregistered users can. So, what exactly do you add to any debate/talk/chat by stating the obvious and never doing anything productive yourself?? And, you clearly do this only to certain articles. Should I thank you for only tagging the "Notable Players" section with the relevant tag and not removing it per some wikipedia policy? Heracletus (talk) 17:14, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Calm down, and go and read WP:CIVIL. Ilikeeatingwaffles (talk) 00:41, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The majority of such lists feature players who made international cap(s) when playing for the club and players with 100+ league appearances for the club. For consistensy, I think the same should be done here. Cheers. – Kosm1 fent 16:37, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS isn't a valid argument, unfortunately. Ilikeeatingwaffles (talk) 17:42, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Huh? I'm not endorsing such lists. The anon user asked which criteria are normally used, and I answered. – Kosm1 fent 17:58, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Split tag 01/12

Someone has added a split tag, but there does not seem to be a discussion. Since the article is large enough to warrant splitting, I am going ahead and splitting it. Op47 (talk) 13:27, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why (Thessaloniki)in brackets for the title of the article? How many Aris FCs are there??

Seems a bit silly. Reaper7 (talk) 14:03, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Removed Vandalization

Removed Vandalization in the text.

The name of the coach Thomas Kössler has been changed in January 2014, id 590746760. Glyxbaer (talk) 13:40, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 16 October 2015

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. The consensus is that the Thessaloniki club is the primary topic for "Aris F.C." The dab page will be moved to Aris F.C. (disambiguation) and then deleted, it can be covered by hatnotes. Jenks24 (talk) 02:30, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Aris F.C. (Thessaloniki) → Aris F.C. – This has been back and forth between the two names a couple of times, so is clearly not uncontroversial and needs an RM to determine where it should sit. I have no strong opinions one way or the other but we need to come to consensus here rather than editors moving the page back and forth. Fenix down (talk) 13:22, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 17:03, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support - this is a clear PRIMARYTOPIC, hatnotes for the other, minor clubs is the solution here. Giant Snowman 17:05, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Clear primary topic, and the two articles do not have the exact same name. sst ✈ 02:36, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Requested move 29 November 2015

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. Wish we could have figured this out a month ago, but such is life. Jenks24 (talk) 14:28, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Aris F.C. → Aris Thessaloniki F.C. – I belive that the correct title for the article is Aris Thessaloniki F.C. in accordance with the UEFA like AEK Athens F.C. ([2]). --IM-yb (talk) 00:39, 15 November 2015 (UTC) --Relisted. Natg 19 (talk) 01:27, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisting as this request was not transcluded to the logs correctly. Natg 19 (talk) 01:27, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging the editors involved in last month's RM. @Fenix down, GiantSnowman, and SSTflyer:. Jenks24 (talk) 08:09, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 12:20, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support - even the Greek article is called Aris Thessaloniki (el:Άρης Θεσσαλονίκης (ποδόσφαιρο ανδρών)) —Мандичка^YO 😜 12:22, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I think, in the past RM checked only the official website of the club and not the UEFA and other sources in english (independent.co.uk, gettyimages.co.uk). The main sources in english don't use "Aris FC". The departments of the club (fibaeurope.com) referred to as Aris Thessaloniki (eurosport.co.uk) or Aris Salonica (or Salonika). Not Aris FC (BC and others). That is only the translation in the official website of the club. UEFA, Euroleague Basketball and others contain the geographical qualifier of the club. --IM-yb (talk) 17:50, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support - yes, seems sensible. Giant Snowman 19:08, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Most usual -Odythal (talk) 19:13, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Muhib mansour (talk) 05:12, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Aris Thessaloniki F.C.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20130727181650/http://markakis.yooblog.gr:80/2008/03/14/259/ to http://markakis.yooblog.gr/2008/03/14/259/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

N An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked= to true

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 01:55, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 10 external links on Aris Thessaloniki F.C.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 22:53, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Aris Thessaloniki F.C.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:00, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Aris Thessaloniki F.C.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.uefa.com/uefaeuropaleague/clubs/club%3D52949/index.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100825193903/http://www.arisfm.gr/ to http://www.arisfm.gr/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:36, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ολυμπιακός β

Σας πόνεσε πολύ γαυρακια 111.65.51.16 (talk) 15:19, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]