Talk:Argentina and weapons of mass destruction

	Latin America portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject South America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to South America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject South AmericaTemplate:WikiProject South AmericaSouth America articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Argentina (assessed as Low-importance).

Military history: South America

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	South American military history task force

[Untitled]

Wouldn't the lead paragraph be considered POV by some? --Andersmusician VOTE 05:59, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

which part ? --Jor70 10:49, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"which was scrapped when democracy was restored in 1983":, weren't references to democracy in non-related articles controversial? --Andersmusician VOTE 18:45, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry but i still do not get your point --Jor70 20:59, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

well, it won't be easy to explain for a non-latin american, sorry I'll leave this for later --Andersmusician VOTE 04:21, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Soy lationamericano, podes explicarmelo en español si te es mas facil --Jor70 10:48, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Only one? No, Spain developed Nuclear Weapons years before

Spain´s first Nuclear power plant was built in 1959 and soon another eight more followed. Franco supported clearly the Spanish nuclear program and it was well developed when democracy arrived in 1975, after Fraco´s death.

The testing place would be the Western Sahara, by then an Spanish colony. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.147.235.212 (talk) 02:29, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your comment. Personally, I have never heard about this before. Would you be so kind to find a proper source for that information, so that it can be added to the article? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.127.127.41 (talk) 14:56, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

But in the 80'they were ready to build a nuclear bomb and missile too. The inspectors confirmed that part. The argentina never build it, but they have the resourses, the knowledge and the facilities to do it. Now they get energy from 2 nuclear plants. Most of the people only speak about atucha I (and the II that´s under construction) But there is another small one working in imbalsado. They build with their own tecnology. There was not only a nuclear program, but a nuclear weapons programs too. I cant find something like that in the spanish history. Spain have more nuclear plants. But most of them with foreing tecnology.

(See translation below) "El primer documento oficial donde se reconoce la capacidad española para fabricar la bomba atómica data de 1967, y se trata de una circular interna del Ministerio de Asuntos Exteriores a varias de sus embajadas en el extranjero" Crónica de El Mundo, 10 de junio de 2001

"The first official document where Spain's ability to produce the atomic bomb is admitted is dated in 1967. It is an internal circular letter issued by the Ministerio de Asuntos Exteriores for several Spanish embassies overseas" Crónica de El Mundo, June 12, 2001. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Haylli (talk • contribs) 17:47, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Confusion =

The section on nuclear weapons is a mix of various ideas but is not precise. As far as I know, there was no official nuclear weapons program in Argentina during the last dictatorship. There were some nuclear weapons specialists, and submarine nuclear propulsion was envisioned, but an actual project never existed. The text carries on mixing things: a uranium enrichment plant was designed and constructed between '78 and '83 near Bariloche, but it was not capable of enriching up to weapons grade. The research reactor has nothing to do with it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.0.233.51 (talk) 17:28, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]