Talk:Arden-Arcade, California

California Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved per request. - GTBacchus^(talk) 09:03, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Arden-Arcade, California → Arden Arcade — Arden-Arcade is no longer preferred. In fact, the incorporation work all references the name Arden Arcade, which is how this page should properly be entitled. Thank you. 64.113.104.96 (talk) 00:39, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support original proposal to move to Arden Arcade as specified in movereq tag and displayed at WP:RM, per WP:TITLE (I've restored the text to what it was when the request was made): titles should be "only as precise as is necessary" and "shorter titles are often preferred to longer ones.". --Born2cycle (talk) 19:56, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

WP:NCGN#United States

Per WP:NCGN#United States, current census-designated places, and most other communities, in the United States such as this one should be in the form of [[Placename, State]] (the "comma convention"). This appears to have never been addressed in the recent RM discussion above; only removing the hyphen between "Arden" and "Arcade". Therefore, I have moved it accordingly. Cheers. Zzyzx11 (talk) 09:25, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Also, if Arden Arcade does become an incorporated city, the page title shall remain using the "comma convention" per the same WP:NCGN#United States guideline. Thanks. Zzyzx11 (talk) 10:26, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Name

Should be hyphenated, as that is NOW the official census name for a census-designated place; that trumps (as the official name) the purported 2 person consensus above. Moves back to an unhyphenated version will result in 2 articles, with all census data removed from the unhyphenated, because that refers to some amorphous territory not to any Census-designated place, and a separate article for the CDP. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 16:04, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It would have been preferred if you had begun a discussion instead of disregarding previous consensus. Now you have created two articles, which is of course unnecessary. They both refer to the same thing and to purport that Arden Arcade is not the same as Arden-Arcade is original research. It would appear that the U.S. Census does not determine city/CDP names but the entities themselves. 08OceanBeach^S.D. 08:55, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The census bureau determines the name; we use the official English-language name. Nothing can be simpler. If you contend that Arden Arcade is the same as Arden-Arcade, and the latter is clearly the official name, why do you persist in moving it? I note with irony that the citation on the defeated referendum on cityhood seems to say that had it passed, the incorporated entity also would have borne the dreaded hyphen. That you can be deluded by the pas-de-deux above as a consensus against fact, reason, and policy is surprising because I thought you generally a good judge of such things. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 05:09, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

As you have seen, I have dropped the issue. If the referendum for city hood failed and the CDP still bears the hyphenated name, then that should be the title of the article. However I assumed the issue was similar to that of San Jose, California, on whether or not to have the accent mark as part of the title name. The city was displayed unofficially but commonly as San Jose, though now I believe that is now the official name. Though I can see an argument being made on whether it is the common name and if should be located at the unhyphenated title. Only reliable sources will support that case though. It now seems the above discussion should have been more thorough and involved more editors. As of now I have no opposition to the article being located at the hyphenated title. 08OceanBeach^S.D. 09:48, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Capital City Freeway reference

The reference in the Transportation heading is nonsense. It reads, "Just to the east of the CDP is the Capital City Freeway..." The freeway runs to the west (and then north) of the CDP. Jonball52 (talk) 15:38, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

History of name

Very interesting to hear the history of the Arcade part of the name, but I'm still wondering who or what Arden is. When I was at Sac State in the 90's, I loved Arden Fair Mall. YellowAries2010 (talk) 16:19, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 10 external links on Arden-Arcade, California. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:04, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 9 external links on Arden-Arcade, California. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:26, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned references in Arden-Arcade, California

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Arden-Arcade, California's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "USCensusEst2016":

From Butte County, California: "Annual Estimates of the Resident Population: April 1, 2010 to July 1, 2016 Estimates". Retrieved April 27, 2017.
From Glenn County, California: "Population and Housing Unit Estimates". Retrieved June 9, 2017.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:31, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Arden-Arcade, California. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:00, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

2020 Census Figure

Until the 2020 official census figures is released later this year, it was removed mainly because it's unsourced. The 2010 figure has been restored. -Moreau36--Discuss 02:37, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]