Talk:Arcola, Illinois
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
Hostage situation wikinews
[edit]On June 21, 2007 a hostage situation occurred at the First Mid-Illinois Bank at the corners of U.S. Route 45 and Illinois Route 133. This event started at 9:45 am with a traffic stop ten miles north of Arcola. A Douglas County deputy was shot in the face and torso.[1]
- Moved from main article. This isn't really a news archive page, if something encyclopedic can be found here, I wouldn't object. Though tragic, a death or shooting doesn't seem to have far reaching long term noteworthiness. --Dual Freq 22:57, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
- I would have to agree. I struggled to see if this should be included or not. Really, this is just one event in the village's history. Even though it is on national news, it really isn't encyclopedic.--Kranar drogin 23:06, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
i like arcola@
[edit]Bold text —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.116.52.23 (talk) 21:40, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
Assessment comment
[edit]The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Arcola, Illinois/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
Comment(s) | Press [show] to view → |
---|---|
==As of September 17, 2008==
This article is a good start; while it only technically has a short geography section, a demographics section, and an infobox, it also holds a picture and a lengthy lead that could be broken down into seperate categories, including History and Culture & Media. What this article needs is:
I rated this a Low-importance article because of its small population and relative anonymity on an international scale. --Starstriker7(Say hior see my works) 01:23, 18 September 2008 (UTC) |
Last edited at 01:23, 18 September 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 08:11, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Arcola, Illinois. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6YSasqtfX?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.census.gov%2Fprod%2Fwww%2Fdecennial.html to http://www.census.gov/prod/www/decennial.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130911234518/http://factfinder2.census.gov to http://factfinder2.census.gov
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160623222247/http://www.raggedyann-museum.org/ to http://www.raggedyann-museum.org/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:47, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
This article should probably cite its sources more directly
[edit]I'm guessing most of the stuff about Raggedy Ann's author, the local Amish culture, etc., came from the websites listed in the "External Links" section, but if they're being used as sources, they should probably be cited and listed as such. I'm noting this here just in case I don't get around to it later. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.19.207.30 (talk) 08:00, 17 May 2020 (UTC)