Talk:Archpriest

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Archpriest article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Christianity Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Catholicism Low‑importance

Archpriest is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the Catholic Church. For more information, visit the project page.CatholicismWikipedia:WikiProject CatholicismTemplate:WikiProject CatholicismCatholicism

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Catholicism task list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : see Draft articles
Assess : see Category:Unassessed Catholicism articles; Category:Unknown-importance Catholicism articles
Cleanup : Blessed Virgin Mary (see the talk page)
Collaborate : Invitation template needed, see Category:WikiProject invitation templates
Copyedit : Cuthbert Tunstall
Expand : Angelus; Roman Catholicism in Kosovo; Bishop Adolph John Paschang; Cum sæpe accidere; Altar Society; American Board of Catholic Missions; Bernard Häring
NPOV : Americanism (heresy); Ensoulment
Photo : see Category:Wikipedia requested photographs of Catholicism
Stubs : see Category:Stub-Class Catholicism articles; Category:Catholic Church stubs
Update : Peer review; John Aloysius Maguire
Verify : Archdiocese of Glasgow; Archbishop of Westminster; Bishop; Saint Mungo; Sanctification; Westminster Cathedral
Other : Watch recent changes for Catholicism articles

Occupations (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Occupations, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.OccupationsWikipedia:WikiProject OccupationsTemplate:WikiProject OccupationsOccupations

Re: the first sentence in this article

Is it not redundant to say "Latin Rite of the ROMAN Catholic Church" as Latin and Roman are equivalent verbiage? Its no big deal but it does seem a bit awkward, IMO. Micael (talk) 21:50, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dean of boking

It is Dean of boking or Dean of booking ??? Thanks a lot Guilhem06 15:26, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Boking. It's nowadays in Essex, but I think it was part of the historical East Anglia. TCC (talk) (contribs) 23:53, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vicariate and Deanery

The Roman Catholic Diocese of Erie has three Vicariates -- East, North, and West Vicariate. Map of Erie Diocese And each vicariate has several deaneries. See Deanery. This level of administration below a diocese is seen today in at least three dioceses in the US, probably more. In Wikipedia, Vicariate redirects to Vicar, so I added a disambiguation note at Vicar recommending that those looking for Vicariate may also wish to look at Deanery. It explains in some detail the Canon that allows a vicariate to be formed. Deanery contains a link to Vicar Forane, but that link redirects to Archpriest, which says the position is arcane except in Rome and a few other sites. Someone who knows more about the Roman Catholic church may wish to revamp Wikipedia's assessment of vicariates and include at least a mention of them under diocese and parish. Pat 05:49, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merge from Protopope

The Wikipedia article Protopope contains much useful information that is relevant here--though its inclusion would considerably lengthen this article. If it is deemed best not to merge the two, a prominent link from this article to taht one should IMHO be placed in this article. Any opinions? MishaPan (talk) 18:13, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A merger isn't really appropriate, as the articles are about different subjects. A link in the see also section would be appropriate. Dgf32 (talk) 19:24, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]