Talk:Archer artillery system

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Archer artillery system article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Military history: Land vehicles / Technology / Weaponry / European / Nordic

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military land vehicles task force
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	European military history task force
	Nordic military history task force

Sweden Low‑importance

	Sweden portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sweden, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sweden-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwedenWikipedia:WikiProject SwedenTemplate:WikiProject SwedenSweden articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Users

Removed this until sources are provided:

The Nigerian Army made an order for 48 Archer Artillery systems in 2008.

BP OMowe (talk) 21:35, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Crew

According to FutureWeapons on Discovery Channel this vehicle has a crew of 2. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J9WR0-OxPno&feature=related —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.254.130.98 (talk) 19:42, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cleared up BP OMowe (talk) 21:33, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

LEMUR system

think we should add that it has the LEMUR system as a gun-sight, wich also can be used as a backup weapon since it has a integrated .50 M2 heavy machinegun. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.226.15.37 (talk) 13:27, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Archer will not be fitted with the lemur system, it will instead be fitted with a similar but not as capable system from norweigian defence contractor kongsberg. This as a part of the counter purchases that is involved in this affair. 90.230.55.21 23:11, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Photo

Can anyone give us an image of that system? Perhaps from flickr? Would be great! -- 93.196.118.9 (talk) 14:00, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Anchoring down

Some SPG systems do not have anchor down as the ARCHER apparently must before firing. Would someone with more expertise than mine like to comment on this shortcoming? The ARCHER system's ability to "scoot" quickly after it shoots seems to be limited by this Achilles heel. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.226.104.225 (talk) 21:02, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not an expert, but since the Archer is mounted on a wheeled frame with suspension, It has to deploy supports like a mobile crane or similar, as seen at the rear of the picture in the article. This to negate the sway wich would be created in the suspension when firing. "Deploying" or raising these shouldn't particularly inhibit it's 'scoot' ability, as the time would be neglible and likely operated by the driver, even if moving. Raymond Holmoey (talk) 18:32, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate

Doesn't Archer - FH77BW L 52 talks about the same thing?, I think both should be merged.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Zaher1988 (talk • contribs) 09:32, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

http://www.army-technology.com/projects/archerhowitzer/
Triggered by \barmy-technology\.com\b on the local blacklist
http://web.archive.org/web/20110427150710/http://www.army-technology.com/projects/archerhowitzer/
Triggered by \barmy-technology\.com\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II ^Notify_Online 10:37, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—cyberbot II ^Notify_Online 21:15, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Range

The Range value is 500kms , is that accurate? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adaptor40 (talk • contribs) 15:13, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Depends on the ammunition used, but yes. 217.209.73.224 (talk) 23: 17, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

That "range"is quite obviously the range of the vehicle on one fuel tank. Not the range of the gun, not even ammunition dependent.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Archer Artillery System. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090207182631/http://www.mil.se:80/en/News/News-milse/Government-decision-on-Archer/ to http://www.mil.se/en/News/News-milse/Government-decision-on-Archer/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 11:58, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Archer Artillery System. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:04, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Archer Artillery System. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://archive.is/20131211210323/http://dmilt.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=8692:norway-mod-cancels-participation-in-swedish-archer-155mm&catid=1:europe&Itemid=57 to http://dmilt.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=8692%3Anorway-mod-cancels-participation-in-swedish-archer-155mm&catid=1%3Aeurope&Itemid=57

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:49, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Archer at DSEI 2019

https://www.armyrecognition.com/dsei_2019_news_official_show_daily_land_zone/dsei_2019_bae_systems_new_archer_155mm_self-propelled_howitzer_based_on_8x8_man_truck_chassis.html

Will add

BlueD954 (talk) 09:19, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

unit cost

"unit cost" lacks a dimension (currency) and a source. What is the unit cost? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.56.92.191 (talk) 18:06, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dated Text?

"... for completion in 2009." ?? that's over a decade ago. 75.18.109.180 (talk) 18:09, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Total built is incorrect

In main info number of archers built listed at 48. Article states 7 and 1 built then each county had 24 built. Wouldn’t the total be 56? 47.227.84.51 (talk) 01:37, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]