Talk:Archbishopric of Riga
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
Dates of Office Holders
[edit]Did Friedrich von Pernstein really become bishop as early as 1304? If so, were there officially two bishops for several years, or is the end date for Jens Grand (fetched from that article) wrong - was he a bishop without a seat for six years? /Dcastor 19:19, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
References
[edit]I am downgrading the assessment of this article for the WikiProject Latvia. Where are the references? Talk/♥фĩłдωəß♥\Work 20:05, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
Coins of Jasper Linde
[edit]Footnote 2 is unclear or wrong. There is at least one joint coin issue of Linde and Plettenberg, with Linde's arms (Lindebaum). Source: [1] Haljak 416. Peterk2 (talk) 19:04, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
References
- ^ Livonian Coins, G Haljak, 2010
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Archbishopric of Riga. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070223134832/http://www.historia.lv:80/alfabets/R/ri/rigas_arhbisk/rigas_arhbisk.htm to http://www.historia.lv/alfabets/R/ri/rigas_arhbisk/rigas_arhbisk.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:35, 17 October 2016 (UTC)