Talk:Arbeideren (Hamar)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: SCB '92 (talk • contribs • count) 22:13, 18 September 2011 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

---

Not a bad looking article

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   good

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

   good

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   good

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   good

   C. No original research:

   good

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   good

   B. Focused:

   good

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

   good

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

   good

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   good

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

   good

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   In the Labour Party Period section, the two images seem to be sandwiching the text between them, and I think the text "First World War" should link to "World War I" instead of redirect, so to look like this "First World War"; other than that, the article looks fine and meets the criteria