Talk:Aratinga
Text and/or other creative content from List of Aratinga parakeets was copied or moved into Aratinga with this edit on August 28, 2016. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
Any reason why none of these birds are called conures here? cheers, Casliber | talk | contribs 03:56, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
Some were called conures, but the term "conure", as now explained by the article, is primarily used in birdkeeping, and almost all formal scientific sources use "parakeet". This dichotomy is further discussed in the article Conure. XarBiogeek 03:34, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
Popular name of several Aratinga species is Jandaia, aka Jandaya
[edit]Hi, i'm writing to inform that the popular name of several of these species is Jandaia, usually written as Jandaya in the scientificic naming. That can be read in the Portuguese version of the article.
I'm no biologist, so the warning.
Peace,
--Hgfernan (talk) 07:48, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
List of Aratinga parakeets merge
[edit]I am proposing the above article be merged with Aratinga. All of the content of List of Aratinga parakeets would fit nicely in the Aratinga article. The number of Aratinga species is now substantially lower with genera splits. In addition, the List of Aratinga parakeets is out of date, and would be easier to maintain by merging into Aratinga.....Pvmoutside (talk) 21:40, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
- I support the proposed merger. Details of the 6 species in the genus can easily be accommodated within this article. With all the recent changes in taxonomy the maintenance of Wikipedia articles is a serious issue. Having one less article to update is always welcome. Aa77zz (talk) 11:14, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 6 external links on Aratinga. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140627000000/http://www.iucnredlist.org to http://www.iucnredlist.org
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140627000000/http://www.iucnredlist.org to http://www.iucnredlist.org
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140627000000/http://www.iucnredlist.org to http://www.iucnredlist.org
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140627000000/http://www.iucnredlist.org to http://www.iucnredlist.org
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140627000000/http://www.iucnredlist.org to http://www.iucnredlist.org
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140627000000/http://www.iucnredlist.org to http://www.iucnredlist.org
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:40, 17 October 2016 (UTC)